Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 979 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Evill Adam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Evill Adam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Evill Adam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Evill Adam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:54 | 12:16 to 08:22 | 65.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 08:29 to 06:56 | 26.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 06:28 to 06:07 | 5.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 06:32 to 06:24 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:35 to 47:35 | 0.0% |
| Evill Adam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:09 | 00:00 | 05:18 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 06:09 | 04:43 -00:22 | 05:18 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 10:30 | 05:48 -00:22 | 10:01 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 15:56 | 03:34 -00:38 | 15:49 +00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 18:52 | 06:23 -00:37 | 19:23 -00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 06:28 | 24:38 | 06:11 +00:17 | 25:46 -01:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 31:06 | 06:22 -00:39 | 31:57 -00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:29 | 36:49 | 07:05 +01:24 | 38:19 -01:30 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 45:18 | 06:38 -00:38 | 45:24 -00:06 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 51:18 | 05:14 -00:35 | 52:02 -00:44 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 55:57 | 06:27 -00:24 | 57:16 -01:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 01:02:00 | 02:37 -00:34 | 01:03:43 -01:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 01:04:03 | 06:27 -00:36 | 01:06:20 -02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:32 | 01:09:54 | 06:37 -00:05 | 01:12:47 -02:53 |
| Running 8 | 06:41 | 01:16:26 | 07:36 -00:55 | 01:19:24 -02:58 |
| Wall Balls | 12:16 | 01:23:07 | 08:42 +03:34 | 01:27:00 -03:53 |
| Roxzone | 09:39 | 01:44:53 | 09:11 +00:28 | 01:44:53 |
Adam Evill showed a commendable performance, ranking in the top 57% of 4107 athletes and in the top 61% of his age group (30-34). His total running time was notably 03:35 faster than average, indicating his strength in running. However, his overall time and roxzone time suggest room for improvement in transitions and overall fitness. His pacing seemed to be faster than average, especially in the running segments, but slower in strength-based segments such as the wall balls and burpees broad jump. This suggests that Adam has a more runner profile and may benefit from incorporating more strength training into his routine.
Adam should aim to start the race at a controlled pace to conserve energy for the later, more taxing segments of the race. He should also focus on maintaining a smooth and efficient form during the strength-based exercises to prevent unnecessary fatigue. Regular hydration and nutrition throughout the race could also help maintain his energy levels and speed. Lastly, practicing transitions between segments during training could help reduce his roxzone time on race day.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gorrin Jesus | 2022 London | 01:45:11 | |
| Van Rensburg Kyle | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:44:37 | |
| Buijs Wouter | 2024 Hamburg | 01:44:31 | |
| Lubba Chris | 2024 Paris | 01:44:51 | |
| Macaulay Calum | 2024 Melbourne | 01:45:21 | |
| Redha Ahmad | 2024 Dubai | 01:44:24 | |
| Power Dan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:44:31 | |
| De Feo Fabio | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:44:43 | |
| Walton Antony | 2023 Birmingham | 01:44:48 | |
| Priester Jesse | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:45:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
