Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:28 (From 45:26 to 41:58) | 60.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:54 (From 06:36 to 04:42) | 32.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 (From 03:05 to 02:45) | 5.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 (From 02:08 to 02:04) | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:23 to 04:23) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:09 to 04:09) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:45 to 04:45) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:21 to 03:21) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:39 to 04:39) | 0.0% |
| De Klijne Tommy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:22 | 00:00 | 04:40 -00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:22 | 04:27 -00:04 | 04:40 -00:18 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 08:45 | 05:00 -00:27 | 09:07 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 13:18 | 02:56 +00:09 | 14:07 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 16:23 | 05:26 +00:48 | 17:03 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 06:36 | 22:37 | 05:00 +01:36 | 22:29 +00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 29:13 | 05:25 +00:30 | 27:29 +01:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:09 | 35:08 | 05:22 -01:13 | 32:54 +02:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 39:17 | 05:35 +00:21 | 38:16 +01:01 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 45:13 | 04:50 -00:05 | 43:51 +01:22 |
| Running 6 | 05:53 | 49:58 | 05:28 +00:25 | 48:41 +01:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 55:51 | 02:12 -00:04 | 54:09 +01:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 57:59 | 05:25 +00:16 | 56:21 +01:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:21 | 01:03:40 | 05:08 -01:47 | 01:01:46 +01:54 |
| Running 8 | 06:54 | 01:07:01 | 06:04 +00:50 | 01:06:54 +00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:39 | 01:13:55 | 06:33 -01:54 | 01:12:58 +00:57 |
| Roxzone | 08:01 | 01:26:29 | 06:58 +01:03 | 01:26:29 |
Tommy's total running time of 00:45:26 is 03:48 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap of 00:04:22 is 00:07 faster than average, suggesting that he has good speed and endurance.
In conclusion, Tommy De Klijne performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. Focusing on improving overall fitness and reducing transition time, as well as targeting specific segments for improvement through tailored training strategies and techniques, will help him achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Dylan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:48 | |
| Peterson Charles | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:26:44 | |
| Hinchliffe Brett | 2023 Birmingham | 01:26:33 | |
| Hesse John | 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:31 | |
| Owens David | 2024 Paris | 01:26:21 | |
| Alireza Sulaiman Abdullah A | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:26:21 | |
| Swift Richard | 2023 Glasgow | 01:26:06 | |
| Dainty Richard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:02 | |
| Requena López Jesus | 2023 Bilbao | 01:26:28 | |
| Hardisty Matthew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam De Klijne Tommy | 01:21:44 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam De Klijne Tommy | 01:15:22 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
De Klijne Tommy
