Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 793 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cook Glen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cook Glen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cook Glen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cook Glen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:15 | 04:31 to 03:16 | 38.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:38 | 03:48 to 03:10 | 19.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:27 | 04:38 to 04:11 | 14.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 02:11 to 01:51 | 10.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 03:42 to 03:24 | 9.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 01:39 to 01:30 | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:02 to 03:58 | 2.1% |
| Run Total | 00:02 | 33:18 to 33:16 | 1.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Cook Glen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:06 | 00:00 | 03:46 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:06 | 04:07 -00:05 | 03:46 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 04:01 | 07:08 | 03:59 +00:02 | 07:53 -00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 11:09 | 02:21 -00:10 | 11:52 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 04:24 | 13:20 | 04:15 +00:09 | 14:13 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 17:44 | 03:38 +00:53 | 18:28 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 04:18 | 22:15 | 04:14 +00:04 | 22:06 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:48 | 26:33 | 03:32 +00:16 | 26:20 +00:13 |
| Running 5 | 04:22 | 30:21 | 04:20 +00:02 | 29:52 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:03 | 34:43 | 04:20 -00:17 | 34:12 +00:31 |
| Running 6 | 04:19 | 38:46 | 04:16 +00:03 | 38:32 +00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:39 | 43:05 | 01:41 -00:02 | 42:48 +00:17 |
| Running 7 | 04:17 | 44:44 | 04:16 +00:01 | 44:29 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:42 | 49:01 | 03:41 +00:01 | 48:45 +00:16 |
| Running 8 | 04:34 | 52:43 | 04:33 +00:01 | 52:26 +00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 04:38 | 57:17 | 04:34 +00:04 | 56:59 +00:18 |
| Roxzone | 04:19 | 01:06:05 | 04:32 -00:13 | 01:06:05 |
However, there are areas where Glen can improve his performance to further excel in future races. His total running time of 00:33:18 was 00:40 slower than the average, suggesting that he may need to focus on improving his running speed and endurance. Additionally, his time in the Burpees Broad Jump segment was 00:35 slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in this area. Finally, the Sled Pull segment also showed a significant time loss of 00:38 compared to the average.
Overall, Glen Cook's performance in the 2023 Birmingham HYROX race was impressive. By focusing on improving his running speed, endurance, and addressing the areas of weakness identified in the Sled Pull and Burpees Broad Jump segments, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Implementing specific training strategies, techniques, and race strategies will help him achieve his full potential as a fitness athlete in the HYROX race category.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Soppa Robin | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:05:35 | |
| Wilkins Brandon | 2022 Birmingham | 01:06:03 | |
| Friesen Cam | 2022 London | 01:05:43 | |
| Gonzlez Alonso David | 2023 Bilbao | 01:06:05 | |
| Fenech Sean | 2024 Poznan | 01:06:04 | |
| Bouzouita Ramy | 2024 Marseille | 01:05:52 | |
| Martin Bill | 2023 Glasgow | 01:05:50 | |
| Flipse Chris | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:05:38 | |
| Lance Baptiste | 2024 Paris | 01:05:43 | |
| McGranaghan Dan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:05:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Stockholm | 01:07:59 | |
| 2024 Poznan | 01:02:08 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:03:55 | |
| 2023 Warschau | 01:28:50 | |
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:11:15 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:11:15 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:09:44 | |
| 2023 London | 01:09:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
