Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brook Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brook Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brook Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brook Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:02 | 47:19 to 44:17 | 56.7% |
| Sled Push | 01:07 | 04:06 to 02:59 | 20.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:59 | 06:05 to 05:06 | 18.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 06:56 to 06:45 | 3.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 05:39 to 05:37 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Brook Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:56 | 04:33 -00:20 | 04:47 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 08:09 | 05:14 -00:01 | 09:20 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 04:06 | 13:22 | 03:07 +00:59 | 14:34 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:59 | 17:28 | 05:43 +00:16 | 17:41 -00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 06:05 | 23:27 | 05:20 +00:45 | 23:24 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 06:42 | 29:32 | 05:42 +01:00 | 28:44 +00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:39 | 36:14 | 05:54 -00:15 | 34:26 +01:48 |
| Running 5 | 06:16 | 41:53 | 05:53 +00:23 | 40:20 +01:33 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 48:09 | 04:57 -00:15 | 46:13 +01:56 |
| Running 6 | 06:08 | 52:51 | 05:43 +00:25 | 51:10 +01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 58:59 | 02:20 -00:20 | 56:53 +02:06 |
| Running 7 | 06:15 | 01:00:59 | 05:42 +00:33 | 59:13 +01:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:35 | 01:07:14 | 05:33 -00:58 | 01:04:55 +02:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:55 | 01:11:49 | 06:28 +00:27 | 01:10:28 +01:21 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:18:44 | 07:10 -00:14 | 01:16:56 +01:48 |
| Roxzone | 06:12 | 01:31:41 | 07:35 -01:23 | 01:31:41 |
Based on his splits analysis, Matthew's running performance was slightly slower than average, with a total running time of 00:47:19, which was 03:28 slower than the average. This suggests that Matthew could benefit from improving his running speed and endurance. However, it's worth noting that his Best running Lap time of 00:03:56 was 00:42 faster than average, indicating that he has the potential to excel in running if he focuses on improving his overall running performance.
In conclusion, Matthew Brook performed well in the HYROX race but has areas of improvement to further enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, as well as addressing specific weaknesses in segments such as running 4, sled push, and running 7, Matthew can excel in future races. Implementing race strategies such as pacing and transition efficiency will also contribute to his overall performance improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yates Rob | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:08 | |
| Schöttler Matthias | 2022 Hamburg | 01:31:17 | |
| Walter Christian | 2019 Essen | 01:31:30 | |
| Neary David | 2022 New York | 01:32:01 | |
| Bruno Claudio | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:31:25 | |
| Bevan Lewis | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:31:27 | |
| Paech Torben | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:03 | |
| Craig Patrick | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:31:22 | |
| Cummings Rob | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:31:56 | |
| Hillebrand Raymon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:41 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
