Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chambers Greg's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chambers Greg's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chambers Greg's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chambers Greg's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:34 | 50:34 to 47:00 | 76.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:33 | 02:59 to 02:26 | 11.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 03:33 to 03:17 | 5.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 06:28 to 06:16 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:42 to 04:38 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:27 to 06:27 | 0.0% |
| Chambers Greg | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:13 | 00:00 | 05:03 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 05:13 | 04:38 +00:04 | 05:03 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 09:55 | 05:30 -00:04 | 09:41 +00:14 |
| Sled Push | 03:33 | 15:21 | 03:17 +00:16 | 15:11 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 18:54 | 06:01 +00:07 | 18:28 +00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 25:02 | 05:45 -00:39 | 24:29 +00:33 |
| Running 4 | 06:28 | 30:08 | 06:02 +00:26 | 30:14 -00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:28 | 36:36 | 06:29 -00:01 | 36:16 +00:20 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 43:04 | 06:16 +00:33 | 42:45 +00:19 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 49:53 | 05:07 -00:04 | 49:01 +00:52 |
| Running 6 | 06:39 | 54:56 | 06:05 +00:34 | 54:08 +00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:59 | 01:01:35 | 02:27 +00:32 | 01:00:13 +01:22 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:04:34 | 06:04 +00:09 | 01:02:40 +01:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:03 | 01:10:47 | 06:04 -01:01 | 01:08:44 +02:03 |
| Running 8 | 07:42 | 01:15:50 | 07:01 +00:41 | 01:14:48 +01:02 |
| Wall Balls | 06:27 | 01:23:32 | 07:51 -01:24 | 01:21:49 +01:43 |
| Roxzone | 08:13 | 01:38:02 | 08:22 -00:09 | 01:38:02 |
Pacing and Profile:
Greg's overall running time of 00:50:34 was 04:38 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running performance. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:13 was 00:22 slower than average. This suggests that he may have started the race at a slower pace and could benefit from working on his speed and endurance.
In summary, Greg Chambers had a solid performance in the 2022 London Hyrox race. To improve his overall race performance, he should focus on improving his running performance, particularly in segments 6, 5, and 8. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, long runs, and strength exercises, will help him enhance his performance in these areas. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as starting strong, minimizing rest and transition times, and developing a pacing strategy will contribute to his overall improvement in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parisi Emmanuele | 2022 Madrid | 01:38:27 | |
| Sundermann Tim | 2023 Hamburg | 01:37:58 | |
| Bassi Gorav | 2023 Birmingham | 01:38:24 | |
| Jahn Patrick | 2024 Köln | 01:38:28 | |
| Elston Luke | 2022 Birmingham | 01:38:17 | |
| Brusaferri Claudio | 2024 Rimini | 01:37:45 | |
| Schmodde Neil | 2024 Hamburg | 01:38:05 | |
| Evers Mario | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:38:11 | |
| Connolly Eoghan | 2024 Dublin | 01:37:43 | |
| Ingram Jelani | 2024 Dallas | 01:37:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:34:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
