Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Worth Jamie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Worth Jamie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Worth Jamie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Worth Jamie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:32 | 07:51 to 05:19 | 30.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:43 | 08:48 to 07:05 | 20.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 06:59 to 05:54 | 12.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:52 | 06:25 to 05:33 | 10.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:48 | 03:07 to 02:19 | 9.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:39 | 03:46 to 03:07 | 7.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:26 | 05:00 to 04:34 | 5.2% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 05:15 to 04:57 | 3.6% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:02 to 39:02 | 0.0% |
| Worth Jamie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:43 | 00:00 | 04:54 +00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 05:43 | 04:34 +00:26 | 04:54 +00:49 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 10:43 | 05:21 -00:51 | 09:28 +01:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:46 | 15:13 | 03:12 +00:34 | 14:49 +00:24 |
| Running 3 | 04:30 | 18:59 | 05:52 -01:22 | 18:01 +00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 07:51 | 23:29 | 05:30 +02:21 | 23:53 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 31:20 | 05:51 -00:52 | 29:23 +01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:59 | 36:19 | 06:07 +00:52 | 35:14 +01:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:04 | 43:18 | 06:03 -00:59 | 41:21 +01:57 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 48:22 | 05:00 +00:15 | 47:24 +00:58 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 53:37 | 05:52 -00:53 | 52:24 +01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:07 | 58:36 | 02:24 +00:43 | 58:16 +00:20 |
| Running 7 | 04:51 | 01:01:43 | 05:52 -01:01 | 01:00:40 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:25 | 01:06:34 | 05:43 +00:42 | 01:06:32 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 04:29 | 01:12:59 | 06:40 -02:11 | 01:12:15 +00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 08:48 | 01:17:28 | 07:25 +01:23 | 01:18:55 -01:27 |
| Roxzone | 08:05 | 01:34:13 | 07:53 +00:12 | 01:34:13 |
Jamie Worth's performance in the 2024 Milan HYROX race places him in the top 59% of all participants and the top 65% within his age group. Notably, his total running time was 7:50 faster than the average, highlighting his strength in running. This suggests a runner profile, with room for improvement in strength-based segments. Jamie's initial running laps were slower than average, indicating a possibly conservative start, but he picked up significant speed in subsequent laps, maintaining an impressive pace overall.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Polanco De La Rosa José Joaquín | 2023 Madrid | 01:34:19 | |
| Wahlund Jesper | 2023 Stockholm | 01:34:04 | |
| Maurer Marcel | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:01 | |
| Kahden Rico | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:34:00 | |
| Köfalvi Philipp | 2019 Wien | 01:34:36 | |
| Valentukonis Povilas | 2024 Malaga | 01:34:08 | |
| Chan Andrew | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:34:17 | |
| Bouchane Redouane | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:33:59 | |
| Martinez Mattia | 2024 Paris | 01:34:05 | |
| Rufus Aaron | 2024 London | 01:34:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
