Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Teppema Jeffrey's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Teppema Jeffrey hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Teppema Jeffrey’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Teppema Jeffrey's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:00 | 41:18 to 38:18 | 58.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:03 | 05:17 to 04:14 | 20.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:25 | 04:39 to 04:14 | 8.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:24 to 04:04 | 6.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:00 to 01:49 | 3.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 02:30 to 02:22 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Teppema Jeffrey | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:25 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 03:25 | 04:20 -00:16 | 04:19 -00:54 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 07:29 | 04:37 +00:21 | 08:39 -01:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 12:27 | 02:40 -00:10 | 13:16 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 14:57 | 05:00 +00:16 | 15:56 -00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 04:24 | 20:13 | 04:26 -00:02 | 20:56 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 24:37 | 04:59 +00:19 | 25:22 -00:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:17 | 29:55 | 04:38 +00:39 | 30:21 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 35:12 | 05:07 +00:21 | 34:59 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:16 | 40:40 | 04:39 -00:23 | 40:06 +00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 44:56 | 05:01 +00:23 | 44:45 +00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 50:20 | 02:01 -00:01 | 49:46 +00:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 52:20 | 05:00 +00:23 | 51:47 +00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:39 | 57:43 | 04:33 +00:06 | 56:47 +00:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:02:22 | 05:27 +00:42 | 01:01:20 +01:02 |
| Wall Balls | 04:41 | 01:08:31 | 05:44 -01:03 | 01:06:47 +01:44 |
| Roxzone | 05:23 | 01:18:27 | 05:56 -00:33 | 01:18:27 |
In terms of running, Jeffrey had a total running time of 00:41:18, which is 02:47 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running performance. However, it is worth noting that his best running lap was 00:03:25, which is 00:46 faster than the average. This suggests that Jeffrey has the potential to perform well in running segments.
In conclusion, Jeffrey Teppema had a strong performance in the 2023 Amsterdam Hyrox race. While he performed well overall, there are specific areas that can be improved to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his running performance, specifically endurance and speed, and implementing efficient transition strategies, Jeffrey can further excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mueller Reto | 2024 Bilbao | 01:18:12 | |
| Van Der Net Bart | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:18:52 | |
| Kadak Önder | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:11 | |
| Passaretti Mauro | 2024 Rimini | 01:17:59 | |
| Rugene Emo | 2022 Berlin | 01:18:28 | |
| Westhoff Frederik | 2022 Hamburg | 01:18:54 | |
| Daher Joey | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:49 | |
| Joriskes Pieter | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:06 | |
| Padilla Omar | 2023 Anaheim | 01:18:50 | |
| Fischer Marco | 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
