Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tasevski Iris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tasevski Iris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tasevski Iris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tasevski Iris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:23 | 47:36 to 46:13 | 40.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:58 | 03:38 to 02:40 | 28.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 06:12 to 05:35 | 18.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 06:18 to 06:04 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 05:09 to 05:05 | 2.0% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:25 to 05:21 | 2.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 04:47 to 04:44 | 1.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:29 to 03:29 | 0.0% |
| Tasevski Iris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:51 | 00:00 | 05:16 -01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 03:51 | 05:10 -00:01 | 05:16 -01:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:57 | 09:00 | 05:36 +00:21 | 10:26 -01:26 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 14:57 | 02:49 +00:49 | 16:02 -01:05 |
| Running 3 | 06:16 | 18:35 | 05:52 +00:24 | 18:51 -00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 06:12 | 24:51 | 05:58 +00:14 | 24:43 +00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:54 | 31:03 | 05:56 -00:02 | 30:41 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:18 | 36:57 | 06:26 -00:08 | 36:37 +00:20 |
| Running 5 | 06:19 | 43:15 | 06:05 +00:14 | 43:03 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 05:25 | 49:34 | 05:27 -00:02 | 49:08 +00:26 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 54:59 | 05:57 -00:01 | 54:35 +00:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 01:00:55 | 02:18 -00:08 | 01:00:32 +00:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 01:03:05 | 05:55 -00:03 | 01:02:50 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:29 | 01:08:57 | 05:00 -01:31 | 01:08:45 +00:12 |
| Running 8 | 07:35 | 01:12:26 | 06:27 +01:08 | 01:13:45 -01:19 |
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 01:20:01 | 05:13 -00:26 | 01:20:12 -00:11 |
| Roxzone | 08:00 | 01:32:39 | 07:14 +00:46 | 01:32:39 |
However, there are areas where Iris can further improve her performance. Her total running time of 00:47:36 was 01:43 slower than the average finish time. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time in order to enhance her performance in the race. Additionally, her Roxzone time of 00:08:00 was 01:09 slower than the average, suggesting that she may have rested more or taken longer transitions between exercise zones. To improve this segment, Iris should work on improving her overall fitness and reducing her transition time.
It is also worth noting that Iris' best running lap was 00:03:51, which was 01:11 faster than the average. This highlights her strength in running and suggests that she may have a runner profile. To further enhance her performance, Iris should focus on strengthening her overall fitness and improving her transition time.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the recommended training techniques and exercises, Iris can further enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grufferty Roselyn | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:02 | |
| Grossmann Katja | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:33:00 | |
| O'Malley Gyee | 2024 New York | 01:32:55 | |
| Zimmer Anna | 2024 Köln | 01:32:17 | |
| Kelly Ciara | 2024 Dublin | 01:32:09 | |
| Hawes Veronica | 2023 Melbourne | 01:32:11 | |
| Ward Kayla | 2022 Dallas | 01:32:57 | |
| Hernandez Alessia | 2024 Dallas | 01:32:36 | |
| Kitts Swasti | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:33:02 | |
| Ferguson Grace | 2024 Sydney | 01:33:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
