Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Low David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Low David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Low David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Low David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:11 | 06:59 to 04:48 | 59.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:04 | 06:54 to 05:50 | 29.2% |
| Run Total | 00:13 | 41:02 to 40:49 | 5.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 04:40 to 04:29 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Low David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:00 | 00:00 | 04:32 +01:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 06:00 | 04:24 -00:17 | 04:32 +01:28 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 10:07 | 04:52 -00:07 | 08:56 +01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 14:52 | 02:51 -00:27 | 13:48 +01:04 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 17:16 | 05:17 -00:19 | 16:39 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:40 | 22:14 | 04:48 -00:08 | 21:56 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 26:54 | 05:15 -00:05 | 26:44 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:59 | 32:04 | 05:06 +01:53 | 31:59 +00:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 39:03 | 05:25 -00:13 | 37:05 +01:58 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 44:15 | 04:46 -00:20 | 42:30 +01:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 48:41 | 05:18 -00:12 | 47:16 +01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 53:47 | 02:08 -00:28 | 52:34 +01:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 55:27 | 05:17 -00:06 | 54:42 +00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:00:38 | 04:56 -00:25 | 59:59 +00:39 |
| Running 8 | 04:42 | 01:05:09 | 05:50 -01:08 | 01:04:55 +00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 06:54 | 01:09:51 | 06:16 +00:38 | 01:10:45 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 07:00 | 01:23:38 | 06:37 +00:23 | 01:23:38 |
David Low demonstrated a strong performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox event, finishing in the top 33% overall and top 35% within his age group. His total running time was 00:41:02, which is 01:09 faster than the average, indicating a strong running ability. However, his performance in strength-based exercises like the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls suggests that there is room for improvement in the strength segments. His initial running pace was slower than average, suggesting a cautious start, but his overall running was consistent and efficient. David shows a hybrid profile with a slight edge towards running efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson Eddy | 2023 Glasgow | 01:23:56 | |
| Luiken Diederik | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:23:29 | |
| Wright Broc | 2024 Brisbane | 01:24:04 | |
| Van Driel Jorden | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:32 | |
| Van De Ven Bram | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:41 | |
| Zeuner Niklas | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:24:06 | |
| Bradley Tom | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:13 | |
| Clarkson Matthew | 2023 London | 01:23:33 | |
| Van De Luitgaren Jessejulian | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:04 | |
| Harrison Peter | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
