Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Leep Peter's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Leep Peter's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Leep Peter's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Leep Peter's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 04:02 to 02:17 | 41.7% |
| Run Total | 01:14 | 46:17 to 45:03 | 29.4% |
| Rowing | 00:32 | 05:28 to 04:56 | 12.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:31 | 05:04 to 04:33 | 12.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 03:12 to 03:04 | 3.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 05:50 to 05:48 | 0.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:49 to 06:49 | 0.0% |
| Leep Peter | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:52 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:04 | 03:46 | 04:33 +00:31 | 04:52 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 08:50 | 05:19 +00:19 | 09:25 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 14:28 | 03:10 +00:02 | 14:44 -00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 17:40 | 05:48 -00:04 | 17:54 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:01 | 23:24 | 05:27 -00:26 | 23:42 -00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 28:25 | 05:48 -00:01 | 29:09 -00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:50 | 34:12 | 06:05 -00:15 | 34:57 -00:45 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 40:02 | 06:00 +00:00 | 41:02 -01:00 |
| Rowing | 05:28 | 46:02 | 04:59 +00:29 | 47:02 -01:00 |
| Running 6 | 06:06 | 51:30 | 05:50 +00:16 | 52:01 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:02 | 57:36 | 02:21 +01:41 | 57:51 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 01:01:38 | 05:49 +00:25 | 01:00:12 +01:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 01:07:52 | 05:41 -01:27 | 01:06:01 +01:51 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:12:06 | 06:37 +00:27 | 01:11:42 +00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:49 | 01:19:10 | 07:25 -00:36 | 01:18:19 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 07:43 | 01:33:36 | 07:52 -00:09 | 01:33:36 |
Peter Leep demonstrated commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX race, securing a rank within the top 48% overall and 49% in his age group. His total running time was particularly impressive, clocking in 00:17 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, Peter's pacing strategy may have been slightly off as he started very fast, especially in Running 1, where he was 01:01 faster than average and in the 6th percentile. Despite this strong start, his running times gradually slowed across subsequent segments, suggesting he may have expended too much energy early on. Considering the split times, Peter appears to have a more runner-oriented profile and could benefit from enhancing his strength components to balance his performance further.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Holmblad Christian | 2024 Stockholm | 01:33:11 | |
| Lawson Nathan | 2024 Hamburg | 01:33:58 | |
| Brown Jamie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:04 | |
| Ferstl Markus | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:33:12 | |
| Chareyre Glen | 2024 Paris | 01:33:48 | |
| Pencek Jason | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:33:17 | |
| Conaty Michael | 2024 Poznan | 01:33:47 | |
| Vigotti Giacomo | 2023 Milan | 01:33:43 | |
| Baroncelli Simone | 2024 Milan | 01:33:45 | |
| De Haas Juan | 2024 Maastricht | 01:33:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:41:02 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:40:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
