Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kerklaan Esmee's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kerklaan Esmee's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kerklaan Esmee's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kerklaan Esmee's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:42 | 48:30 to 44:48 | 66.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 07:03 to 05:42 | 24.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 02:57 to 02:32 | 7.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 05:22 to 05:18 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Kerklaan Esmee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 05:10 -01:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 03:42 | 05:06 -00:28 | 05:10 -01:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 08:20 | 05:26 +00:27 | 10:16 -01:56 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 14:13 | 02:45 +00:12 | 15:42 -01:29 |
| Running 3 | 06:30 | 17:10 | 05:45 +00:45 | 18:27 -01:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 23:40 | 05:43 -00:21 | 24:12 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 06:21 | 29:02 | 05:46 +00:35 | 29:55 -00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:03 | 35:23 | 05:59 +01:04 | 35:41 -00:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:32 | 42:26 | 05:53 +00:39 | 41:40 +00:46 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 48:58 | 05:21 -00:15 | 47:33 +01:25 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 54:04 | 05:48 +00:21 | 52:54 +01:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 01:00:13 | 02:16 -00:14 | 58:42 +01:31 |
| Running 7 | 06:16 | 01:02:15 | 05:46 +00:30 | 01:00:58 +01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:48 | 01:08:31 | 04:42 -00:54 | 01:06:44 +01:47 |
| Running 8 | 07:11 | 01:12:19 | 06:09 +01:02 | 01:11:26 +00:53 |
| Wall Balls | 04:09 | 01:19:30 | 04:51 -00:42 | 01:17:35 +01:55 |
| Roxzone | 05:43 | 01:29:13 | 06:47 -01:04 | 01:29:13 |
Pacing: Esmee's pacing throughout the race was relatively consistent, with some segments being faster and others slower than the average. It is important for her to maintain a steady pace and avoid significant variations to optimize her performance.
Profile: Esmee's total running time of 00:48:30 is 03:41 slower than the average. This suggests that she may benefit from focusing more on her running training to improve her overall fitness. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:03:42 indicates that she has the potential to excel in running segments.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Esmee Kerklaan can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races. It is recommended that she consults with a coach or trainer to develop a personalized training plan tailored to her specific strengths and areas for improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martins Ana | 2024 Stockholm | 01:28:50 | |
| Harris Ruby | 2024 London | 01:28:48 | |
| Leishman Kerry | 2022 London | 01:29:02 | |
| Mcclelland Amber | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:36 | |
| Maier Alexandra | 2024 Berlin | 01:29:41 | |
| Moreno Aida | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:47 | |
| Vaughan Andrea | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:32 | |
| Montgomery Lynsey | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:21 | |
| Duncan Alyssa | 2024 Perth | 01:29:27 | |
| Barrientos Andrea | 2024 New York | 01:29:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
