Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Groot Jop's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Groot Jop's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Groot Jop's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Groot Jop's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:35 | 48:26 to 44:51 | 65.5% |
| Sled Push | 01:14 | 04:17 to 03:03 | 22.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 05:49 to 05:12 | 11.3% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:57 to 04:55 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| De Groot Jop | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:40 | 00:00 | 04:51 -01:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:40 | 04:33 -00:15 | 04:51 -01:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:56 | 07:58 | 05:18 +00:38 | 09:24 -01:26 |
| Sled Push | 04:17 | 13:54 | 03:09 +01:08 | 14:42 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 06:25 | 18:11 | 05:46 +00:39 | 17:51 +00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 05:49 | 24:36 | 05:24 +00:25 | 23:37 +00:59 |
| Running 4 | 06:46 | 30:25 | 05:45 +01:01 | 29:01 +01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:04 | 37:11 | 06:00 -00:56 | 34:46 +02:25 |
| Running 5 | 06:29 | 42:15 | 05:57 +00:32 | 40:46 +01:29 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 48:44 | 04:58 -00:01 | 46:43 +02:01 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 53:41 | 05:48 +00:16 | 51:41 +02:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 59:45 | 02:21 -00:15 | 57:29 +02:16 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 01:01:51 | 05:46 +00:21 | 59:50 +02:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 01:07:58 | 05:37 -01:29 | 01:05:36 +02:22 |
| Running 8 | 07:03 | 01:12:06 | 06:34 +00:29 | 01:11:13 +00:53 |
| Wall Balls | 05:08 | 01:19:09 | 07:15 -02:07 | 01:17:47 +01:22 |
| Roxzone | 08:39 | 01:32:48 | 07:46 +00:53 | 01:32:48 |
Jop De Groot performed well in the HYROX race in Amsterdam, finishing with an overall rank of 632 out of 1473 athletes, placing him in the top 42% of competitors. In his age group (25-29), he achieved a rank of 121 out of 290 athletes, also placing him in the top 41%. His overall time was 01:32:48, with a total running time of 00:48:26, which was 04:14 slower than the average.
Jop's best running lap was 00:03:40, which was 01:02 faster than the average time. However, he struggled in some segments, such as Running 2, Sled Push, Running 4, Running 3, Running 5, Running 8, Running 7, Running 6, and the Roxzone, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training exercises and techniques tailored to address the areas of improvement, Jop De Groot can enhance his performance in future HYROX races and achieve better results in his age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wong Chi Wai Kevin | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:32:22 | |
| Manojlovic Igor | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:32:52 | |
| Nicolò Domenico | 2024 Rimini | 01:33:08 | |
| Seemann Philip | 2018 Essen | 01:32:23 | |
| Armes Henry | 2022 Manchester | 01:32:29 | |
| Harper Tod | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:33:06 | |
| Kvasovs Aleks | 2021 London | 01:33:08 | |
| Geisler Martin | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:32:28 | |
| Luna Juan | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:32:19 | |
| Derichs Philipp | 2024 Poznan | 01:32:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
