Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 40 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcgettigan Erin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcgettigan Erin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcgettigan Erin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcgettigan Erin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 28:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 19:56 | 01:19:35 to 59:39 | 68.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:09 | 12:16 to 09:07 | 10.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:44 | 11:10 to 08:26 | 9.4% |
| Sled Pull | 02:04 | 09:56 to 07:52 | 7.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:35 | 03:55 to 03:20 | 2.0% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 06:01 to 05:43 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 05:19 to 05:07 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 11:14 to 11:14 | 0.0% |
| Mcgettigan Erin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 08:06 | 00:00 | 06:41 +01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:19 | 08:06 | 05:10 +00:09 | 06:41 +01:25 |
| Running 2 | 07:55 | 13:25 | 07:14 +00:41 | 11:51 +01:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:43 | 21:20 | 04:30 -00:47 | 19:05 +02:15 |
| Running 3 | 10:59 | 25:03 | 08:40 +02:19 | 23:35 +01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 09:56 | 36:02 | 09:04 +00:52 | 32:15 +03:47 |
| Running 4 | 09:22 | 45:58 | 08:47 +00:35 | 41:19 +04:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 12:16 | 55:20 | 12:03 +00:13 | 50:06 +05:14 |
| Running 5 | 10:31 | 01:07:36 | 09:32 +00:59 | 01:02:09 +05:27 |
| Rowing | 06:01 | 01:18:07 | 06:07 -00:06 | 01:11:41 +06:26 |
| Running 6 | 09:52 | 01:24:08 | 08:58 +00:54 | 01:17:48 +06:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:55 | 01:34:00 | 03:27 +00:28 | 01:26:46 +07:14 |
| Running 7 | 10:13 | 01:37:55 | 09:07 +01:06 | 01:30:13 +07:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:10 | 01:48:08 | 11:02 +00:08 | 01:39:20 +08:48 |
| Running 8 | 12:42 | 01:59:18 | 13:04 -00:22 | 01:50:22 +08:56 |
| Wall Balls | 11:14 | 02:12:00 | 14:33 -03:19 | 02:03:26 +08:34 |
| Roxzone | 08:10 | 02:31:14 | 13:15 -05:05 | 02:31:14 |
Based on his splits analysis, Erin's running performance was slightly slower than average, with a total running time of 01:19:35, which was 10:35 slower than average. However, his best running lap time of 00:07:55 indicates that he has the potential to excel in running if he focuses on specific training strategies.
In conclusion, Erin Mcgettigan showed a commendable performance in the 2023 New York Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, optimizing transition time, and incorporating targeted strength and running training strategies, he can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wood Liam | 2024 London | 02:30:53 | |
| R Asyraf | 2024 Singapore | 02:31:16 | |
| Cundall Wayne | 2023 Birmingham | 02:31:14 | |
| Vargas Salas Jhonatan | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:31:37 | |
| Ramsden Jack | 2022 London | 02:31:31 | |
| Janssen Robin | 2024 Rotterdam | 02:31:05 | |
| Miller Scott | 2022 Dallas | 02:31:18 | |
| Mckeegan Chris | 2023 Barcelona | 02:31:29 | |
| Jover Juan Cesar | 2022 Madrid | 02:31:24 | |
| Lim Wei Ji | 2024 Singapore | 02:31:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 02:39:08 | |
| 2024 New York | 02:37:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
