Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Holland Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Holland Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Holland Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Holland Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:06 | 43:32 to 39:26 | 72.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:39 | 02:33 to 01:54 | 11.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:30 | 02:58 to 02:28 | 8.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 04:45 to 04:30 | 4.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:10 | 04:36 to 04:26 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Holland Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:47 | 00:00 | 04:26 +00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 04:47 | 04:22 -00:08 | 04:26 +00:21 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 09:01 | 04:46 +00:10 | 08:48 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:58 | 13:57 | 02:45 +00:13 | 13:34 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 16:55 | 05:09 +00:10 | 16:19 +00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 03:35 | 22:14 | 04:39 -01:04 | 21:28 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 25:49 | 05:07 +00:26 | 26:07 -00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 31:22 | 04:57 -00:12 | 31:14 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 36:07 | 05:16 +00:18 | 36:11 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 41:41 | 04:42 -00:16 | 41:27 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 46:07 | 05:09 +00:27 | 46:09 -00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 51:43 | 02:04 +00:29 | 51:18 +00:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 54:16 | 05:08 +00:31 | 53:22 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 59:55 | 04:48 -00:12 | 58:30 +01:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:04:31 | 05:38 +00:34 | 01:03:18 +01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 04:16 | 01:10:43 | 06:03 -01:47 | 01:08:56 +01:47 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:21:16 | 06:17 +00:07 | 01:21:16 |
Based on his splits analysis, Matthew performed best in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he was faster than the average time. However, he struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 7, Running 6, Running 8, and Running 4, where he lost significant time compared to the average. Additionally, the Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating that he may have rested more or taken longer transitions.
Overall, Matthew Holland had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to further enhance his performance. By focusing on his running endurance, improving his transition time, and working on specific segments where he lost time, he can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wallwork Steven | 2022 Manchester | 01:21:13 | |
| Moore Jason | 2023 Dublin | 01:21:30 | |
| Van Aken Nick | 2022 Maastricht | 01:21:03 | |
| Albala Oscar | 2024 Bilbao | 01:21:32 | |
| Etxepare Virto Unai | 2022 Madrid | 01:20:46 | |
| Schnettler Frank | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:21:18 | |
| Goulden Luke | 2024 Malaga | 01:21:11 | |
| Wee Warren | 2023 Singapore | 01:20:58 | |
| Porter Andrew | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:47 | |
| Morris Alex | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:21:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
