Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clark Katherine's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clark Katherine's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clark Katherine's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clark Katherine's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:08 | 07:19 to 05:11 | 49.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:04 | 07:37 to 06:33 | 24.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:51 | 03:08 to 02:17 | 19.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:10 | 03:00 to 02:50 | 3.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 05:08 to 05:03 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:11 to 47:11 | 0.0% |
| Clark Katherine | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:51 | 00:00 | 05:26 +01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:05 | 06:51 | 05:15 -00:10 | 05:26 +01:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 11:56 | 05:46 -00:13 | 10:41 +01:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 17:29 | 02:56 +00:04 | 16:27 +01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 20:29 | 06:05 -00:32 | 19:23 +01:06 |
| Sled Pull | 05:26 | 26:02 | 06:15 -00:49 | 25:28 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 31:28 | 06:07 -00:28 | 31:43 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:37 | 37:07 | 06:55 +00:42 | 37:50 -00:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 44:44 | 06:17 -00:26 | 44:45 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 50:35 | 05:32 -00:32 | 51:02 -00:27 |
| Running 6 | 05:53 | 55:35 | 06:10 -00:17 | 56:34 -00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:08 | 01:01:28 | 02:25 +00:43 | 01:02:44 -01:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 01:04:36 | 06:09 -00:23 | 01:05:09 -00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 01:10:22 | 05:16 -00:08 | 01:11:18 -00:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:08 | 01:15:30 | 06:43 -00:35 | 01:16:34 -01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:19 | 01:21:38 | 05:32 +01:47 | 01:23:17 -01:39 |
| Roxzone | 07:38 | 01:36:28 | 07:39 -00:01 | 01:36:28 |
From the data and analysis, Katherine Clark's overall performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event was commendable. She ranked in the top 18% of all athletes and top 19% in her age group (30-34). As a British athlete, she held her own in a highly competitive field. Her total running time of 00:47:11 was faster than average by 02:03, indicating her strong running ability. Her best running lap was a swift 00:05:33. However, her first running segment was slower than average, suggesting an initial pacing issue or perhaps a need for a more rigorous warm-up routine. The rest of her running segments were faster than average, demonstrating her ability to maintain pace and endurance throughout the race.
Considering Katherine's performance, here are a few strategies that she could implement during the race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Craig Kelsey | 2022 Dallas | 01:36:50 | |
| Waszak Katharina | 2018 Essen | 01:36:45 | |
| Duncan Alex | 2023 Manchester | 01:36:52 | |
| Fuica Sara | 2024 Bilbao | 01:36:10 | |
| Connolly Neve | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:00 | |
| Gebel Julie | 2023 Chicago | 01:36:44 | |
| Mcadam Marie | 2024 Sydney | 01:36:33 | |
| Mo Summer | 2024 Beijing | 01:36:35 | |
| Leleu Charlotte | 2024 Paris | 01:36:36 | |
| Floor Marlies | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
