Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Swaine Trevor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Swaine Trevor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Swaine Trevor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Swaine Trevor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:50 | 48:30 to 45:40 | 56.1% |
| Sled Push | 01:13 | 04:21 to 03:08 | 24.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:30 | 06:05 to 05:35 | 9.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 02:42 to 02:19 | 7.6% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:02 to 04:58 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:37 to 04:34 | 1.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:28 to 06:28 | 0.0% |
| Swaine Trevor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:32 | 00:00 | 04:57 +01:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 06:32 | 04:34 +00:03 | 04:57 +01:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 11:09 | 05:23 -00:34 | 09:31 +01:38 |
| Sled Push | 04:21 | 15:58 | 03:11 +01:10 | 14:54 +01:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:57 | 20:19 | 05:53 +00:04 | 18:05 +02:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 26:16 | 05:31 -00:37 | 23:58 +02:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 31:10 | 05:52 -00:04 | 29:29 +01:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:06 | 36:58 | 06:09 -01:03 | 35:21 +01:37 |
| Running 5 | 06:26 | 42:04 | 06:04 +00:22 | 41:30 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 48:30 | 05:01 +00:01 | 47:34 +00:56 |
| Running 6 | 06:15 | 53:32 | 05:54 +00:21 | 52:35 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 59:47 | 02:24 +00:18 | 58:29 +01:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 01:02:29 | 05:53 +00:11 | 01:00:53 +01:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:05 | 01:08:33 | 05:46 +00:19 | 01:06:46 +01:47 |
| Running 8 | 06:42 | 01:14:38 | 06:44 -00:02 | 01:12:32 +02:06 |
| Wall Balls | 06:28 | 01:21:20 | 07:24 -00:56 | 01:19:16 +02:04 |
| Roxzone | 06:59 | 01:34:40 | 08:00 -01:01 | 01:34:40 |
Trevor's total running time of 00:48:30 is 04:05 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:49 suggests that he has the potential to excel in running segments.
Overall, Trevor Swaine had a strong performance in the 2019 New York Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, as well as his strength and transition times, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating the suggested training strategies and techniques, along with specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to address his areas of improvement, will be key to his success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Leeuw Jan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:48 | |
| Monaghan Ken | 2024 Glasgow | 01:34:37 | |
| Contessa Michele | 2024 Rimini | 01:34:18 | |
| Gigliotti Davide | 2024 Milan | 01:34:55 | |
| Lieber Mike | 2024 Hamburg | 01:34:20 | |
| O Donaile Sean | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:35:05 | |
| Funnel Tim | 2023 London | 01:34:12 | |
| Czarneckiego Bartek | 2023 Barcelona | 01:34:42 | |
| Page Frank | 2021 Chicago | 01:34:55 | |
| Rotman Tije | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
