Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 604 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:49 (From 09:23 to 06:34) | 67.9% |
| BBJ | 00:24 (From 08:22 to 07:58) | 9.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 (From 03:02 to 02:39) | 9.2% |
| Rowing | 00:17 (From 06:05 to 05:48) | 6.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 (From 06:15 to 05:59) | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:58 to 04:58) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:46 to 02:46) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 06:38 to 06:38) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 52:55 to 52:55) | 0.0% |
| Watson Emily | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:05 | 00:00 | 05:46 -01:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:58 | 04:05 | 05:28 -00:30 | 05:46 -01:41 |
| Running 2 | 06:13 | 09:03 | 06:23 -00:10 | 11:14 -02:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 15:16 | 03:18 -00:32 | 17:37 -02:21 |
| Running 3 | 06:38 | 18:02 | 06:48 -00:10 | 20:55 -02:53 |
| Sled Pull | 06:38 | 24:40 | 07:09 -00:31 | 27:43 -03:03 |
| Running 4 | 06:46 | 31:18 | 06:51 -00:05 | 34:52 -03:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:22 | 38:04 | 08:17 +00:05 | 41:43 -03:39 |
| Running 5 | 07:10 | 46:26 | 07:07 +00:03 | 50:00 -03:34 |
| Rowing | 06:05 | 53:36 | 05:48 +00:17 | 57:07 -03:31 |
| Running 6 | 07:10 | 59:41 | 06:56 +00:14 | 01:02:55 -03:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:02 | 01:06:51 | 02:37 +00:25 | 01:09:51 -03:00 |
| Running 7 | 07:12 | 01:09:53 | 06:58 +00:14 | 01:12:28 -02:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:15 | 01:17:05 | 06:12 +00:03 | 01:19:26 -02:21 |
| Running 8 | 07:44 | 01:23:20 | 07:48 -00:04 | 01:25:38 -02:18 |
| Wall Balls | 09:23 | 01:31:04 | 06:42 +02:41 | 01:33:26 -02:22 |
| Roxzone | 08:52 | 01:49:13 | 09:05 -00:13 | 01:49:13 |
Emily Watson's performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox Race was commendable. She ranked in the top 16% of all athletes and top 13% within her age group (30-34). Her total running time of 00:52:55 was 02:18 faster than the average, which indicates she has a more runner profile. This is further highlighted by her best running lap of 00:06:13, displaying her proficiency and strength in running. However, her performance dipped in strength-related activities, indicating potential areas for improvement.
To improve her overall performance, Emily could implement the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Salem Safa | 2024 Dubai | 01:49:01 | |
| Galasso Liana | 2024 Rimini | 01:49:10 | |
| Finnegan Ciara | 2024 Dublin | 01:49:21 | |
| Cabanban Jona France | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:49:31 | |
| Cassata Brittany | 2022 Dallas | 01:49:26 | |
| Kreher Svenja | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:49:03 | |
| Oliver Emma | 2024 New York | 01:48:56 | |
| Jones Taylor | 2024 Singapore | 01:48:52 | |
| König Mirjana | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:49:22 | |
| Kranendonk Mary-Ann | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:49:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Poznan Watson Ben, Watson Emily | 01:18:26 | |
| 2024 Manchester Jackson Karlie, Watson Emily | 01:31:23 | |
| 2024 Birmingham Jackson Karlie, Watson Emily | 01:30:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Watson Emily
