Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 469 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Veggel David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Veggel David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Veggel David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Veggel David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:36 | 01:01:49 to 54:13 | 89.9% |
| Rowing | 00:37 | 06:04 to 05:27 | 7.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 08:05 to 07:57 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:02 to 04:56 | 1.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:03 to 03:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:02 to 06:02 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:53 to 02:53 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:35 to 06:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:08 to 09:08 | 0.0% |
| Van Veggel David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:50 | 00:00 | 05:33 +01:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 06:50 | 04:54 +00:08 | 05:33 +01:17 |
| Running 2 | 06:21 | 11:52 | 06:18 +00:03 | 10:27 +01:25 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 18:13 | 03:58 -00:55 | 16:45 +01:28 |
| Running 3 | 07:11 | 21:16 | 07:08 +00:03 | 20:43 +00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 06:02 | 28:27 | 07:02 -01:00 | 27:51 +00:36 |
| Running 4 | 07:40 | 34:29 | 07:08 +00:32 | 34:53 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:05 | 42:09 | 08:21 -00:16 | 42:01 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 07:55 | 50:14 | 07:32 +00:23 | 50:22 -00:08 |
| Rowing | 06:04 | 58:09 | 05:31 +00:33 | 57:54 +00:15 |
| Running 6 | 07:53 | 01:04:13 | 07:13 +00:40 | 01:03:25 +00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 01:12:06 | 02:54 -00:01 | 01:10:38 +01:28 |
| Running 7 | 07:51 | 01:14:59 | 07:15 +00:36 | 01:13:32 +01:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:35 | 01:22:50 | 07:40 -01:05 | 01:20:47 +02:03 |
| Running 8 | 10:11 | 01:29:25 | 09:08 +01:03 | 01:28:27 +00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 09:08 | 01:39:36 | 09:53 -00:45 | 01:37:35 +02:01 |
| Roxzone | 09:44 | 01:58:21 | 10:53 -01:09 | 01:58:21 |
Based on the splits analysis, David's total running time of 01:01:49 was 06:50 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time. His best running lap was 00:06:21, which suggests that he has the potential to improve his running performance even further.
In conclusion, David Van Veggel performed well in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength training, and improving his transition time, he can improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Poltorak David | 2023 New York | 01:58:16 | |
| Joshi Mayoor | 2024 New York | 01:57:56 | |
| Forschneritsch Mario | 2018 Wien | 01:57:59 | |
| Stevense Leon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:58:37 | |
| Cracknell Alan | 2023 London | 01:58:09 | |
| Dennis Callum | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:58:23 | |
| Raiser Karel | 2024 Poznan | 01:58:34 | |
| Engberg Filip | 2024 Stockholm | 01:57:51 | |
| Leong Keat | 2024 Singapore | 01:57:58 | |
| Tang Chiu Fai | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:58:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 02:00:11 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 02:02:50 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:42:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
