Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 540 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nijenhuis Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nijenhuis Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nijenhuis Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nijenhuis Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:48 | 41:57 to 38:09 | 63.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 05:11 to 04:05 | 18.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:32 | 03:57 to 03:25 | 8.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:32 to 02:06 | 7.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 05:56 to 05:46 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Nijenhuis Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:59 | 00:00 | 04:10 -01:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 02:59 | 04:11 -00:06 | 04:10 -01:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 07:04 | 04:32 +00:10 | 08:21 -01:17 |
| Sled Push | 03:57 | 11:46 | 03:45 +00:12 | 12:53 -01:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 15:43 | 04:56 +00:49 | 16:38 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 05:56 | 21:28 | 06:17 -00:21 | 21:34 -00:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 27:24 | 04:56 +00:28 | 27:51 -00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:11 | 32:48 | 04:22 +00:49 | 32:47 +00:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 37:59 | 05:03 +00:39 | 37:09 +00:50 |
| Rowing | 04:15 | 43:41 | 04:31 -00:16 | 42:12 +01:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 47:56 | 04:57 +00:31 | 46:43 +01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 53:24 | 02:15 +00:17 | 51:40 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 55:56 | 05:00 +00:44 | 53:55 +02:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:43 | 01:01:40 | 05:02 -01:19 | 58:55 +02:45 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:05:23 | 05:28 +00:49 | 01:03:57 +01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:11:40 | 06:47 -01:09 | 01:09:25 +02:15 |
| Roxzone | 04:57 | 01:22:06 | 05:54 -00:57 | 01:22:06 |
Nijenhuis' total running time of 00:41:57 was 02:28 slower than the average, indicating that his running speed could be improved. It is important for him to focus on increasing his running speed and endurance in order to gain a competitive advantage in future races. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:02:59 was 01:21 faster than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in running segments with proper training.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on improving the identified areas, Frank Nijenhuis can enhance his performance in future HYROX races. Consistency in training, regular assessment of progress, and dedicated focus on his weaknesses will contribute to his growth as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ionita Ovidiu | 2024 Milan | 01:22:09 | |
| Manley Danny | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:35 | |
| Jiménez Medina Miguel Ángel | 2024 Mexico City | 01:22:10 | |
| Groschopp Alexander | 2024 Hamburg | 01:22:06 | |
| Trattnig Manuel | 2023 Wien | 01:22:23 | |
| Mong Isaac | 2024 Singapore | 01:21:51 | |
| Thomason Sam | 2022 London | 01:22:01 | |
| François Nicolas | 2024 Marseille | 01:21:40 | |
| Hyde Jamie | 2023 Paris | 01:22:01 | |
| Hagerty Sean | 2024 Incheon | 01:22:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:20:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
