Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Miller Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Miller Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Miller Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Miller Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:53 | 48:10 to 44:17 | 60.2% |
| Wall Balls | 02:03 | 08:48 to 06:45 | 31.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:31 to 02:13 | 4.7% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:59 to 04:53 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 03:04 to 02:59 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:32 to 04:30 | 0.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:30 to 03:30 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:33 to 05:33 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Miller Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:42 | 04:32 +00:00 | 04:46 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 06:39 | 09:14 | 05:14 +01:25 | 09:18 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 15:53 | 03:07 -00:03 | 14:32 +01:21 |
| Running 3 | 06:59 | 18:57 | 05:43 +01:16 | 17:39 +01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 03:30 | 25:56 | 05:18 -01:48 | 23:22 +02:34 |
| Running 4 | 06:52 | 29:26 | 05:41 +01:11 | 28:40 +00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 36:18 | 05:53 -00:20 | 34:21 +01:57 |
| Running 5 | 05:39 | 41:51 | 05:53 -00:14 | 40:14 +01:37 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 47:30 | 04:56 +00:03 | 46:07 +01:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 52:29 | 05:43 -00:15 | 51:03 +01:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 57:57 | 02:19 +00:12 | 56:46 +01:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 01:00:28 | 05:42 -00:05 | 59:05 +01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:06:05 | 05:32 -01:10 | 01:04:47 +01:18 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:10:27 | 06:27 -00:10 | 01:10:19 +00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 08:48 | 01:16:44 | 07:09 +01:39 | 01:16:46 -00:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:06 | 01:31:30 | 07:35 -01:29 | 01:31:30 |
Matthew's total running time of 00:48:10 was 04:32 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he could benefit from improving his running fitness and speed. However, it is worth noting that his best running lap of 00:04:42 was only 00:05 slower than average, indicating that he has the potential to excel in this area.
In conclusion, Matthew Miller had a commendable performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running fitness and speed, particularly in segments like Running 2, Running 3, and Running 4. By incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to enhance performance in these areas, and implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation, Matthew can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hlavatý Vladislav | 2023 München | 01:31:18 | |
| Dietrich Georg | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:31:21 | |
| Röhl Nils | 2024 Berlin | 01:31:51 | |
| Fraser Alistair | 2024 Paris | 01:31:26 | |
| van Tongerlo Djarno | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:31:03 | |
| Fiedler Tobias | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:31:24 | |
| Näslund Björn | 2024 Stockholm | 01:31:40 | |
| Franke Kai | 2023 Hannover | 01:31:19 | |
| Hussein Karim | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:52 | |
| Miquel Miquel | 2024 Köln | 01:31:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
