Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 976 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Meij Tessa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Meij Tessa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Meij Tessa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Meij Tessa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:13 | 44:14 to 40:01 | 72.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:40 | 05:24 to 04:44 | 11.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:24 | 02:15 to 01:51 | 6.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 04:52 to 04:34 | 5.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 03:58 to 03:47 | 3.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 03:33 to 03:30 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Meij Tessa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:43 | 00:00 | 04:38 -00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:24 | 03:43 | 04:55 +00:29 | 04:38 -00:55 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 09:07 | 04:57 +00:36 | 09:33 -00:26 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 14:40 | 02:27 -00:42 | 14:30 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:00 | 16:25 | 05:13 +00:47 | 16:57 -00:32 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 22:25 | 05:00 -00:42 | 22:10 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 26:43 | 05:12 +00:40 | 27:10 -00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:52 | 32:35 | 05:04 -00:12 | 32:22 +00:13 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 37:27 | 05:18 +00:35 | 37:26 +00:01 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 43:20 | 05:07 -00:32 | 42:44 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 47:55 | 05:14 +00:38 | 47:51 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 53:47 | 02:03 +00:12 | 53:05 +00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:38 | 56:02 | 05:12 +00:26 | 55:08 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:58 | 01:01:40 | 04:09 -00:11 | 01:00:20 +01:20 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:05:38 | 05:29 +00:16 | 01:04:29 +01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 03:33 | 01:11:23 | 04:09 -00:36 | 01:09:58 +01:25 |
| Roxzone | 04:59 | 01:19:48 | 05:41 -00:42 | 01:19:48 |
When analyzing her splits, it is evident that Tessa excelled in certain segments while lagging behind in others. Her best running lap of 00:03:43 demonstrates her speed and endurance. However, there were areas where she lost time compared to the average finisher. These segments include Running 3, Running 4, Running 6, Running 2, Running 5, Ski Erg, and Running 7.
In conclusion, Tessa Meij displayed a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Rotterdam. While there were areas for improvement, her overall rank and performance in her age group are commendable. By implementing the suggested training strategies, focusing on specific segments, and refining her race strategies, Tessa can continue to excel and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez Lourdes | 2023 Barcelona | 01:19:33 | |
| Brockwell Sarah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:27 | |
| Grimes Alice | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:46 | |
| Andrews Jess | 2022 London | 01:19:27 | |
| Lo Francis | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:19:28 | |
| Dailyd Ieva | 2024 Gdansk | 01:20:07 | |
| Rogozhina Alissa | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:19:35 | |
| Van Werkhoven Bodile | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:19:27 | |
| Koehler Saskia | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:06 | |
| Lee Deniece | 2024 Singapore | 01:19:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
