Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lowe Alan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lowe Alan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lowe Alan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lowe Alan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:36 | 48:04 to 44:28 | 50.8% |
| Wall Balls | 02:33 | 09:22 to 06:49 | 36.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 06:20 to 05:40 | 9.4% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:06 to 04:54 | 2.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 05:25 to 05:21 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Lowe Alan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:22 | 00:00 | 04:50 +00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 05:22 | 04:33 -00:19 | 04:50 +00:32 |
| Running 2 | 06:39 | 09:36 | 05:18 +01:21 | 09:23 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 01:50 | 16:15 | 03:09 -01:19 | 14:41 +01:34 |
| Running 3 | 04:56 | 18:05 | 05:47 -00:51 | 17:50 +00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 02:56 | 23:01 | 05:23 -02:27 | 23:37 -00:36 |
| Running 4 | 07:13 | 25:57 | 05:46 +01:27 | 29:00 -03:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:20 | 33:10 | 06:00 +00:20 | 34:46 -01:36 |
| Running 5 | 07:25 | 39:30 | 05:57 +01:28 | 40:46 -01:16 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 46:55 | 04:58 +00:08 | 46:43 +00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 52:01 | 05:48 -00:38 | 51:41 +00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 57:11 | 02:22 -00:29 | 57:29 -00:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 59:04 | 05:46 -00:37 | 59:51 -00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:04:13 | 05:36 -00:11 | 01:05:37 -01:24 |
| Running 8 | 06:13 | 01:09:38 | 06:33 -00:20 | 01:11:13 -01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 09:22 | 01:15:51 | 07:15 +02:07 | 01:17:46 -01:55 |
| Roxzone | 07:38 | 01:32:45 | 07:44 -00:06 | 01:32:45 |
Alan Lowe showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Poznan, particularly considering his age group. His top strengths were observed in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry segments where he significantly outperformed the average times. This indicates a strong aptitude for strength-based exercises. However, his overall running time was slower than the average, suggesting a need for improvement in endurance and pacing. He also demonstrated a tendency to start the race slower than average but improved his pace in the latter running segments. Alan appears to have a balanced hybrid profile, with his performance stronger in strength-based exercises but weaker in endurance-based activities like running.
To further improve his performance, Alan could implement the following strategies during the race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Monteith Mark | 2024 New York | 01:32:23 | |
| Van Gulik Aaron | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:32:15 | |
| De Ruiter Bas | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:27 | |
| Heermann Tim | 2023 München | 01:32:18 | |
| Johannes Konstantin | 2024 Köln | 01:33:12 | |
| Cates Michael | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:32:31 | |
| Gaine Tommy | 2024 Malaga | 01:32:41 | |
| Marroig Martinez Rubén | 2023 Barcelona | 01:32:26 | |
| Simons Ralf | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:32:58 | |
| Gilbert Nicolas | 2024 Paris | 01:32:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
