Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hutter Joseph's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hutter Joseph's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hutter Joseph's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hutter Joseph's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:25 | 06:05 to 04:40 | 46.2% |
| Rowing | 00:27 | 05:08 to 04:41 | 14.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:24 | 04:44 to 04:20 | 13.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:52 to 02:37 | 8.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:13 | 06:03 to 05:50 | 7.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 04:58 to 04:48 | 5.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:09 to 01:59 | 5.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:06 to 40:06 | 0.0% |
| Hutter Joseph | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:32 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 03:36 | 04:24 +00:20 | 04:32 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 08:20 | 04:53 -00:26 | 08:56 -00:36 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 12:47 | 02:52 +00:00 | 13:49 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 04:39 | 15:39 | 05:18 -00:39 | 16:41 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 20:18 | 04:49 -00:31 | 21:59 -01:41 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 24:36 | 05:16 -00:19 | 26:48 -02:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:58 | 29:33 | 05:07 -00:09 | 32:04 -02:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 34:31 | 05:26 +00:06 | 37:11 -02:40 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 40:03 | 04:46 +00:22 | 42:37 -02:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 45:11 | 05:18 +00:18 | 47:23 -02:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 50:47 | 02:08 +00:01 | 52:41 -01:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 52:56 | 05:17 +00:13 | 54:49 -01:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:05 | 58:26 | 04:57 +01:08 | 01:00:06 -01:40 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 01:04:31 | 05:51 +00:02 | 01:05:03 -00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 06:03 | 01:10:24 | 06:16 -00:13 | 01:10:54 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:23:49 | 06:39 +00:52 | 01:23:49 |
Joseph Hutter's overall performance in the race was commendable with a rank of 321 out of 1404 athletes, placing him in the top 22% of all participants. In his age group (16-24), he ranked 11th, again landing in the top 20%. A significant highlight of his performance was his total running time of 00:40:06, which was 01:57 faster than the average. This indicates that Joseph has a strong runner's profile and he was able to maintain a good pace throughout the race. However, the roxzone time shows that he took slightly longer rest periods or transitions compared to the average participant.
Joseph should focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race, avoiding starting too fast which can lead to early fatigue. Given his strength in running, he could use running segments as a chance to gain time. It would be beneficial to work on minimizing rest times during transitions, perhaps by practicing quick recovery techniques such as deep breathing exercises. Additionally, it would be helpful for Joseph to familiarize himself with each of the strength segments to ensure efficient movement and energy use.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tedin Suarez Juan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:49 | |
| Fas Oliver | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:42 | |
| Eggert Andre | 2023 Hannover | 01:24:18 | |
| Ward Neil | 2023 London | 01:24:18 | |
| Meier Patrick | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:55 | |
| Fidgett Adam | 2022 Birmingham | 01:23:51 | |
| Scherzer Christoph | 2022 Wien | 01:23:36 | |
| Bilsland Dax | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:34 | |
| Sharafeddine Mahmoud | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:51 | |
| Mack Brian | 2023 Chicago | 01:24:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
