Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 166 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dyer Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dyer Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dyer Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dyer Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 04:10 | 11:38 to 07:28 | 33.5% |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 07:53 to 04:25 | 27.8% |
| Run Total | 02:26 | 59:47 to 57:21 | 19.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:54 | 11:29 to 10:35 | 7.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:53 | 04:04 to 03:11 | 7.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 05:22 to 05:03 | 2.5% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:53 to 05:36 | 2.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:44 to 07:44 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Dyer Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:04 | 00:00 | 05:50 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:22 | 05:04 | 04:59 +00:23 | 05:50 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 06:42 | 10:26 | 06:44 -00:02 | 10:49 -00:23 |
| Sled Push | 07:53 | 17:08 | 04:06 +03:47 | 17:33 -00:25 |
| Running 3 | 07:47 | 25:01 | 07:50 -00:03 | 21:39 +03:22 |
| Sled Pull | 11:38 | 32:48 | 07:26 +04:12 | 29:29 +03:19 |
| Running 4 | 07:22 | 44:26 | 07:46 -00:24 | 36:55 +07:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:44 | 51:48 | 09:08 -01:24 | 44:41 +07:07 |
| Running 5 | 07:18 | 59:32 | 08:41 -01:23 | 53:49 +05:43 |
| Rowing | 05:53 | 01:06:50 | 05:40 +00:13 | 01:02:30 +04:20 |
| Running 6 | 07:42 | 01:12:43 | 08:03 -00:21 | 01:08:10 +04:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:04 | 01:20:25 | 03:04 +01:00 | 01:16:13 +04:12 |
| Running 7 | 07:44 | 01:24:29 | 08:11 -00:27 | 01:19:17 +05:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 01:32:13 | 08:41 -03:26 | 01:27:28 +04:45 |
| Running 8 | 10:10 | 01:37:28 | 10:58 -00:48 | 01:36:09 +01:19 |
| Wall Balls | 11:29 | 01:47:38 | 11:12 +00:17 | 01:47:07 +00:31 |
| Roxzone | 10:55 | 02:09:55 | 11:36 -00:41 | 02:09:55 |
Based on his splits analysis, Michael's best running lap was impressive, finishing 30 seconds faster than average. This suggests that he has a strong running profile and should continue to focus on improving his running performance. However, his total running time was 49 seconds slower than average, indicating that he could benefit from additional running training.
Additionally, he should pay attention to his transition times in the roxzone. By working on improving his overall fitness and reducing transition times, he can gain an advantage over his competitors.
In conclusion, Michael Dyer has shown strong potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his performance in the identified areas, implementing the suggested training strategies, and utilizing effective race strategies, he can continue to excel and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bin Masuri Mohammed Nordin | 2023 Singapore | 02:10:16 | |
| Randall Kevin | 2024 Birmingham | 02:09:44 | |
| Horton Johny | 2023 Birmingham | 02:10:19 | |
| Stoll Alexander | 2024 Karlsruhe | 02:10:09 | |
| Han Dongseok | 2024 Incheon | 02:10:14 | |
| Gomez Chris | 2024 Anaheim | 02:10:25 | |
| Meyerhoff Dominic | 2023 Hamburg | 02:09:56 | |
| Walker Peter | 2023 Singapore | 02:10:16 | |
| Fadda Mark | 2021 Hamburg | 02:09:48 | |
| Lo Ka Man Alex | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:09:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
