Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Drewe Calum's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Drewe Calum's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Drewe Calum's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Drewe Calum's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:23 | 42:42 to 41:19 | 45.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:10 | 05:56 to 04:46 | 38.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 05:16 to 04:55 | 11.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:06 to 02:01 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:24 to 04:22 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Drewe Calum | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:18 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:18 | 04:26 -00:02 | 04:35 +00:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 09:42 | 04:55 +00:15 | 09:01 +00:41 |
| Sled Push | 01:55 | 14:52 | 02:51 -00:56 | 13:56 +00:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 16:47 | 05:21 -00:06 | 16:47 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 22:02 | 04:51 -00:18 | 22:08 -00:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 26:35 | 05:20 -00:02 | 26:59 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:16 | 31:53 | 05:15 +00:01 | 32:19 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 37:09 | 05:30 -00:14 | 37:34 -00:25 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 42:25 | 04:47 -00:05 | 43:04 -00:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 47:07 | 05:21 +00:00 | 47:51 -00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 52:28 | 02:09 -00:03 | 53:12 -00:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 54:34 | 05:20 -00:05 | 55:21 -00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:56 | 59:49 | 05:02 +00:54 | 01:00:41 -00:52 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:05:45 | 05:57 -00:05 | 01:05:43 +00:02 |
| Wall Balls | 05:49 | 01:11:37 | 06:25 -00:36 | 01:11:40 -00:03 |
| Roxzone | 07:30 | 01:24:49 | 06:44 +00:46 | 01:24:49 |
Calum Drewe performed admirably in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 511, placing him in the top 28% of all participants. In his age group (35-39), he ranked 125, putting him in the top 33%. His total time was 01:24:49, with a total running time of 00:42:42, which was slightly slower than the average by 00:02. This indicates a balanced profile with a slight leaning towards strength, as his running time is quite close to average, but his strength-based segments showed significant proficiency, particularly in the sled push.
Calum's pacing was strategic. While he started slower than average in the first running segment, his pace improved throughout the race, as he ran faster than average in most subsequent running segments. This suggests a conservative start with a strong finish, indicating efficient energy management.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Saß Frederic | 2022 Essen | 01:25:07 | |
| Cartledge Sean | 2023 Dublin | 01:24:57 | |
| Hamer Mirko | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:25:05 | |
| Hoban Jose | 2024 Anaheim | 01:25:19 | |
| Moule Alex | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:25:00 | |
| Malpas Aaron | 2023 London | 01:25:01 | |
| Cilea Domenick | 2022 New York | 01:24:38 | |
| Fitzpatrick Colin | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:28 | |
| Zander Jan | 2024 Hamburg | 01:24:21 | |
| Sarratea Dimas | 2024 Paris | 01:24:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
