Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schwindack Lorena's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schwindack Lorena's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schwindack Lorena's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schwindack Lorena's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:31 | 47:41 to 43:10 | 82.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:45 | 03:08 to 02:23 | 13.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 05:07 to 04:55 | 3.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Schwindack Lorena | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 04:56 | 05:01 +00:06 | 04:56 +00:00 |
| Running 2 | 05:29 | 10:03 | 05:18 +00:11 | 09:57 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 15:32 | 02:35 +00:33 | 15:15 +00:17 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 18:40 | 05:33 +00:39 | 17:50 +00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 04:43 | 24:52 | 05:28 -00:45 | 23:23 +01:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 29:35 | 05:36 +00:06 | 28:51 +00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:07 | 35:17 | 05:41 -00:34 | 34:27 +00:50 |
| Running 5 | 07:23 | 40:24 | 05:43 +01:40 | 40:08 +00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:04 | 47:47 | 05:17 -01:13 | 45:51 +01:56 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 51:51 | 05:37 +00:27 | 51:08 +00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 57:55 | 02:11 -00:11 | 56:45 +01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 59:55 | 05:37 +00:07 | 58:56 +00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:31 | 01:05:39 | 04:29 -00:58 | 01:04:33 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:09:10 | 05:58 +00:18 | 01:09:02 +00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 03:04 | 01:15:26 | 04:39 -01:35 | 01:15:00 +00:26 |
| Roxzone | 07:42 | 01:26:03 | 06:24 +01:18 | 01:26:03 |
However, there are specific areas of improvement that can be identified from the splits analysis. Lorena's total running time of 00:47:41 was 04:07 slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in her overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, her running performance in segments Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 5, and Running 6 was slower than the average, suggesting a need for more focused training in running.
In conclusion, Lorena Schwindack showed great potential and performance in the Hyrox race. By focusing on the identified areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can further enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Knops Sabine | 2023 Stockholm | 01:25:42 | |
| St Esther | 2024 Perth | 01:26:01 | |
| Brown Sammy | 2024 London | 01:25:34 | |
| Donaldson Laura | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:50 | |
| Hogendorp Amber | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:49 | |
| Prinzevalli Gina | 2024 New York | 01:25:54 | |
| Fanslau Ute | 2019 Hamburg | 01:25:54 | |
| Porsch Hannah | 2019 Hamburg | 01:25:33 | |
| Billi Martina | 2023 Milan | 01:25:59 | |
| ChiltonMatthews Rebecca | 2024 Brisbane | 01:26:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Berlin | 01:16:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
