Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Potterton David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Potterton David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Potterton David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Potterton David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:27 | 07:30 to 06:03 | 37.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:03 | 06:29 to 05:26 | 27.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 03:34 to 03:11 | 10.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 04:57 to 04:35 | 9.5% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:16 to 04:59 | 7.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:37 to 02:22 | 6.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:04 | 07:20 to 07:16 | 1.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:20 to 44:20 | 0.0% |
| Potterton David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:13 | 00:00 | 04:59 +01:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 06:13 | 04:36 +00:21 | 04:59 +01:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 11:10 | 05:23 -00:11 | 09:35 +01:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:34 | 16:22 | 03:13 +00:21 | 14:58 +01:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 19:56 | 05:53 -00:09 | 18:11 +01:45 |
| Sled Pull | 06:29 | 25:40 | 05:36 +00:53 | 24:04 +01:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 32:09 | 05:54 -00:19 | 29:40 +02:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:30 | 37:44 | 06:19 +01:11 | 35:34 +02:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 45:14 | 06:08 -00:32 | 41:53 +03:21 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 50:50 | 05:03 +00:13 | 48:01 +02:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 56:06 | 05:56 -00:28 | 53:04 +03:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 01:01:34 | 02:27 +00:10 | 59:00 +02:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 01:04:11 | 05:54 -00:12 | 01:01:27 +02:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:28 | 01:09:53 | 05:54 -00:26 | 01:07:21 +02:32 |
| Running 8 | 04:53 | 01:15:21 | 06:49 -01:56 | 01:13:15 +02:06 |
| Wall Balls | 07:20 | 01:20:14 | 07:40 -00:20 | 01:20:04 +00:10 |
| Roxzone | 08:25 | 01:35:51 | 08:07 +00:18 | 01:35:51 |
David Potterton completed the 2024 Hyrox race in Milan with an overall time of 01:35:51, placing him in the top 63% of all competitors and top 69% within his age group (30-34). His total running time of 00:44:20 was notably faster than the average by 02:58, indicating a strong running profile. However, his performance in strength-based segments varied, suggesting room for improvement in these areas. His pacing was steady, with an impressive finish in the final running segment, showing he conserved energy effectively for a strong finish.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Raab Jens | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:35:33 | |
| Karo Pierre | 2024 Stockholm | 01:35:28 | |
| Weir James | 2024 Glasgow | 01:36:00 | |
| Jarosch Heiko | 2022 Bremen | 01:35:55 | |
| Hinz Thomas | 2021 Hamburg | 01:35:55 | |
| Hertogs Sven | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:33 | |
| Gomez Obed | 2021 Austin | 01:35:59 | |
| Ho Nicholas | 2023 Singapore | 01:36:03 | |
| Lübbert Bahne | 2020 Hannover | 01:36:08 | |
| Elgouhary Islam | 2024 Dubai | 01:35:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Madrid | 01:22:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
