Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gibbs Will's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gibbs Will's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gibbs Will's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gibbs Will's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:09 | 07:10 to 06:01 | 22.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 06:04 to 04:58 | 21.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:58 | 03:00 to 02:02 | 18.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 05:23 to 04:36 | 15.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:28 | 03:09 to 02:41 | 9.0% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 05:07 to 04:43 | 7.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:36 to 04:22 | 4.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 04:53 to 04:48 | 1.6% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:12 to 39:12 | 0.0% |
| Gibbs Will | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:54 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 04:54 | 04:26 +00:10 | 04:35 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 09:30 | 04:57 -00:13 | 09:01 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:09 | 14:14 | 02:52 +00:17 | 13:58 +00:16 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 17:23 | 05:22 -00:38 | 16:50 +00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:23 | 22:07 | 04:54 +00:29 | 22:12 -00:05 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 27:30 | 05:21 -00:26 | 27:06 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:04 | 32:25 | 05:17 +00:47 | 32:27 -00:02 |
| Running 5 | 04:58 | 38:29 | 05:31 -00:33 | 37:44 +00:45 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 43:27 | 04:49 +00:18 | 43:15 +00:12 |
| Running 6 | 04:54 | 48:34 | 05:22 -00:28 | 48:04 +00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:00 | 53:28 | 02:10 +00:50 | 53:26 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 56:28 | 05:22 -00:38 | 55:36 +00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:01:12 | 05:05 -00:12 | 01:00:58 +00:14 |
| Running 8 | 05:22 | 01:06:05 | 05:57 -00:35 | 01:06:03 +00:02 |
| Wall Balls | 07:10 | 01:11:27 | 06:29 +00:41 | 01:12:00 -00:33 |
| Roxzone | 06:49 | 01:25:18 | 06:49 +00:00 | 01:25:18 |
Will Gibbs displayed a mixed performance in the 2024 Poznan HYROX event. His overall rank of 388 placed him in the top 50% of all participants and his age-group rank of 73 put him just over the halfway mark within his peers. His total running time was 3:31 faster than average, indicating a strong running performance. However, his initial start was slightly slower compared to the average, as shown by his Running 1 time. After the sluggish start, Will managed to pick up the pace and consistently beat the average times in subsequent running segments. This suggests that he could improve his race performance by starting at a faster pace. Will's areas of strength clearly lie in his running ability, with his best running lap clocking in at 4:44. This is backed up by his impressive speed in the running segments of the race. On the other hand, his time spent in the Roxzone was slightly slower than average, suggesting a need for improvement in his transition time and overall fitness.
Based on the analysis of Will's performance, the following strategies are recommended for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodward Gary | 2023 London | 01:24:59 | |
| Van Leuken Thijs | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:25:11 | |
| Rodrigues Baeta Ludovic | 2024 Paris | 01:25:09 | |
| Kelly Graham | 2024 Berlin | 01:25:03 | |
| Koek Teus | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:25:21 | |
| Vera Mateos Markel | 2024 Bilbao | 01:24:51 | |
| Roumans Rob | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:22 | |
| Jordan Luke | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:57 | |
| Renwick Tom | 2023 Dubai | 01:25:13 | |
| Vonhasselt Thomas | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:25:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:23:52 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:23:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
