Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 847 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ranson Charles's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ranson Charles's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ranson Charles's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ranson Charles's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:41 | 56:52 to 51:11 | 81.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 | 07:14 to 06:42 | 7.6% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 05:41 to 05:17 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 05:11 to 04:49 | 5.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 07:19 to 07:17 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:21 to 06:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:35 to 07:35 | 0.0% |
| Ranson Charles | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:39 | 00:00 | 05:20 +02:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:11 | 07:39 | 04:46 +00:25 | 05:20 +02:19 |
| Running 2 | 08:11 | 12:50 | 05:58 +02:13 | 10:06 +02:44 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 21:01 | 03:41 -01:11 | 16:04 +04:57 |
| Running 3 | 08:57 | 23:31 | 06:35 +02:22 | 19:45 +03:46 |
| Sled Pull | 06:21 | 32:28 | 06:27 -00:06 | 26:20 +06:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 38:49 | 06:36 -00:22 | 32:47 +06:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:19 | 45:03 | 07:21 -00:02 | 39:23 +05:40 |
| Running 5 | 06:23 | 52:22 | 06:52 -00:29 | 46:44 +05:38 |
| Rowing | 05:41 | 58:45 | 05:18 +00:23 | 53:36 +05:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:08 | 01:04:26 | 06:40 -00:32 | 58:54 +05:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 01:10:34 | 02:40 -00:24 | 01:05:34 +05:00 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 01:12:50 | 06:40 -00:19 | 01:08:14 +04:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:14 | 01:19:11 | 06:51 +00:23 | 01:14:54 +04:17 |
| Running 8 | 07:03 | 01:26:25 | 08:11 -01:08 | 01:21:45 +04:40 |
| Wall Balls | 07:35 | 01:33:28 | 08:49 -01:14 | 01:29:56 +03:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:46 | 01:48:40 | 09:55 -02:09 | 01:48:40 |
Charles Ranson's performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race placed him in the top 56% overall and the top 59% in his age group. While this is a solid performance, there's room for improvement, particularly in his running segments and some strength exercises. His total running time was 3:31 slower than average, suggesting a need for enhanced running efficiency and endurance. Notably, Charles demonstrated significant strength in several exercises, such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls, indicating a strong hybrid profile with a slight leaning towards strength rather than pure running efficiency. The pacing analysis indicates that Charles started relatively slow compared to the average in the initial running segments but improved as the race progressed, suggesting a conservative start.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceglia Tommaso | 2024 Milan | 01:48:39 | |
| Vo John | 2022 Dallas | 01:48:42 | |
| Baird Stuart | 2023 Glasgow | 01:48:41 | |
| Bansi Harbi | 2023 London | 01:48:12 | |
| Hernández Fernando | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:48:54 | |
| Douce Barry | 2024 London | 01:48:35 | |
| Pollard Harry | 2024 Stockholm | 01:48:45 | |
| Abrie Phillip | 2023 Manchester | 01:48:58 | |
| Montors Franiesco | 2024 Turin | 01:48:19 | |
| Baranowicz Maciej | 2024 Poznan | 01:48:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
