Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire James Anna's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights James Anna's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the James Anna's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve James Anna's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:44 | 07:09 to 04:25 | 42.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:39 | 07:21 to 05:42 | 25.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 05:56 to 05:18 | 9.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 03:08 to 02:32 | 9.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:24 | 02:30 to 02:06 | 6.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 04:53 to 04:32 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:18 to 05:16 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 05:02 to 05:01 | 0.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:03 to 41:03 | 0.0% |
| James Anna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:56 | 00:00 | 05:09 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 05:56 | 05:06 -00:04 | 05:09 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 10:58 | 05:26 -00:33 | 10:15 +00:43 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 15:51 | 02:44 +00:24 | 15:41 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 18:59 | 05:45 -00:57 | 18:25 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 05:56 | 23:47 | 05:41 +00:15 | 24:10 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 29:43 | 05:45 -00:50 | 29:51 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:21 | 34:38 | 05:58 +01:23 | 35:36 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 04:58 | 41:59 | 05:53 -00:55 | 41:34 +00:25 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 46:57 | 05:21 -00:03 | 47:27 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:01 | 52:15 | 05:47 -00:46 | 52:48 -00:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 57:16 | 02:15 +00:15 | 58:35 -01:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:01 | 59:46 | 05:45 -00:44 | 01:00:50 -01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:04:47 | 04:42 +00:11 | 01:06:35 -01:48 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:09:40 | 06:07 -00:33 | 01:11:17 -01:37 |
| Wall Balls | 07:09 | 01:15:14 | 04:53 +02:16 | 01:17:24 -02:10 |
| Roxzone | 06:48 | 01:29:03 | 06:46 +00:02 | 01:29:03 |
Anna James showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. She finished in the top 12% of all participating athletes and the top 13% in her age group (35-39). Her overall time was 01:29:03, with a total running time of 00:41:03, which was 05:00 faster than the average. This indicates that Anna has a strong runner profile. However, her performance shows some inconsistencies, especially in strength-based exercises and transitions, which she can focus on to improve her overall ranking. Her pacing at the beginning of the race was slower than average, but she managed to recover and maintain a faster pace for the rest of the race.
Based on the splits analysis, Anna's performance in the following segments needs improvement:
For future races, Anna should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Miguel Gambero Cynthia Celia | 2022 Essen | 01:29:31 | |
| Sortwell Charlotte | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:10 | |
| Brookes DeriJae | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:05 | |
| Maas Katherine | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:29:09 | |
| Burns Liz | 2022 Chicago | 01:28:37 | |
| Colbear Amelia | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:04 | |
| Van Den Ing Lisanne | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:29:23 | |
| Banushi Sose | 2024 Milan | 01:28:38 | |
| Arnaudova Simona | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:28:52 | |
| Zarate Daniela | 2024 Anaheim | 01:29:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Manchester | 01:28:05 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:30:11 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:32:10 | |
| 2022 London | 01:59:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
