Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Huffman Claire's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Huffman Claire's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Huffman Claire's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Huffman Claire's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:12 | 50:36 to 46:24 | 88.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 05:05 to 04:47 | 6.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 05:00 to 04:46 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Huffman Claire | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 09:43 | 00:00 | 05:16 +04:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 09:43 | 05:10 -00:10 | 05:16 +04:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:22 | 14:43 | 05:37 -00:15 | 10:26 +04:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 20:05 | 02:50 -00:13 | 16:03 +04:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:53 | 22:42 | 05:53 +00:00 | 18:53 +03:49 |
| Sled Pull | 05:28 | 28:35 | 05:58 -00:30 | 24:46 +03:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 34:03 | 05:57 -00:10 | 30:44 +03:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:39 | 39:50 | 06:29 -00:50 | 36:41 +03:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 45:29 | 06:07 -00:15 | 43:10 +02:19 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 51:21 | 05:27 -00:12 | 49:17 +02:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 56:36 | 06:00 -00:21 | 54:44 +01:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:02:15 | 02:18 -00:14 | 01:00:44 +01:31 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 01:04:19 | 05:57 -00:11 | 01:03:02 +01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:05 | 01:10:05 | 05:01 +00:04 | 01:08:59 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:15:10 | 06:28 +00:09 | 01:14:00 +01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:00 | 01:21:47 | 05:12 -00:12 | 01:20:28 +01:19 |
| Roxzone | 06:19 | 01:32:58 | 07:18 -00:59 | 01:32:58 |
Her overall time of 01:32:58 was impressive, showcasing her dedication and preparation. However, her total running time of 00:50:36 was 04:09 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to work on her overall fitness and transition time in order to improve her performance.
In conclusion, Claire Huffman showed great potential and determination in the 2023 Manchester Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her running performance, minimizing transition times, and incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, she can further enhance her performance in future races. With dedication and targeted training, Claire has the potential to continue excelling in the Hyrox race series.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hausmann Sara | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:33:01 | |
| Verwijlen Pam | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:33:11 | |
| Kelly Ciara | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:36 | |
| Simonds Hannah | 2024 Dallas | 01:33:15 | |
| Harris Julie | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:49 | |
| Schneevoigt Romy | 2022 Leipzig | 01:32:49 | |
| Wrobel Martha | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:32:45 | |
| Bertoni Beatriz | 2021 New York | 01:33:04 | |
| Teall Charlotte | 2023 Birmingham | 01:33:20 | |
| Molon Juliana | 2024 Milan | 01:33:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Bilbao | 01:42:11 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:49:49 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:27:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
