Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire White Christopher's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights White Christopher's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the White Christopher's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve White Christopher's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:02 | 05:50 to 04:48 | 23.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:54 | 04:49 to 03:55 | 20.8% |
| Run Total | 00:45 | 37:04 to 36:19 | 17.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 04:30 to 03:49 | 15.8% |
| Rowing | 00:21 | 04:47 to 04:26 | 8.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:22 to 04:07 | 5.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:10 | 02:20 to 02:10 | 3.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 03:52 to 03:45 | 2.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 01:46 to 01:41 | 1.9% |
| White Christopher | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:27 | 00:00 | 04:09 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 03:27 | 04:16 +00:06 | 04:09 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 07:49 | 04:27 +00:00 | 08:25 -00:36 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 12:16 | 02:33 -00:13 | 12:52 -00:36 |
| Running 3 | 04:40 | 14:36 | 04:49 -00:09 | 15:25 -00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 03:52 | 19:16 | 04:12 -00:20 | 20:14 -00:58 |
| Running 4 | 04:42 | 23:08 | 04:46 -00:04 | 24:26 -01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:30 | 27:50 | 04:22 +00:08 | 29:12 -01:22 |
| Running 5 | 04:52 | 32:20 | 04:55 -00:03 | 33:34 -01:14 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 37:12 | 04:33 +00:14 | 38:29 -01:17 |
| Running 6 | 04:40 | 41:59 | 04:48 -00:08 | 43:02 -01:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 46:39 | 01:55 -00:09 | 47:50 -01:11 |
| Running 7 | 04:50 | 48:25 | 04:48 +00:02 | 49:45 -01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 53:15 | 04:20 +00:29 | 54:33 -01:18 |
| Running 8 | 05:29 | 58:04 | 05:10 +00:19 | 58:53 -00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 05:50 | 01:03:33 | 05:23 +00:27 | 01:04:03 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:38 | 01:14:53 | 05:27 +00:11 | 01:14:53 |
Christopher White placed in the top 30% of all athletes, and the top 37% of his age group, a commendable achievement. His total running time was a minute faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, it's also clear that he has a good strength base, as he performed well in the strength exercises like the sled push and pull. Christopher's pacing strategy seems to have worked well for him, as evidenced by his consistent performance across all running segments.
Christopher should continue to maintain his current pacing strategy, as this seems to work well for him. He might consider starting slightly slower to conserve energy for the latter part of the race. Given his strong running ability, he should aim to make up time on the running segments while focusing on maintaining a steady rhythm on the strength exercises. Transitioning quickly between exercises will also help to improve his overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brown Shaun | 2023 Birmingham | 01:14:48 | |
| Vinken Lennard | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:15:16 | |
| Tyler Mike | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:15:19 | |
| Comyns Brian | 2023 London | 01:14:25 | |
| Crotty Patrick | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:14:25 | |
| Irvine Jeff | 2024 Houston | 01:15:13 | |
| Mcnulty Myles | 2022 Basel | 01:15:19 | |
| Unay Casquero | 2023 Rimini | 01:14:38 | |
| SchaeferRolffs Adrian | 2024 Bilbao | 01:14:43 | |
| Grogan Conor | 2024 Dublin | 01:15:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
