Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcdaniel Chase's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcdaniel Chase's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcdaniel Chase's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcdaniel Chase's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:11 | 05:42 to 04:31 | 37.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:01 | 06:54 to 05:53 | 32.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:41 | 03:19 to 02:38 | 21.7% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:50 to 04:42 | 4.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:07 to 02:00 | 3.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:22 to 04:21 | 0.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:43 to 40:43 | 0.0% |
| Mcdaniel Chase | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:17 | 00:00 | 04:33 -01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 03:17 | 04:25 -00:03 | 04:33 -01:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 07:39 | 04:53 -00:08 | 08:58 -01:19 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 12:24 | 02:52 +00:27 | 13:51 -01:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 15:43 | 05:19 -00:07 | 16:43 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:42 | 20:55 | 04:49 +00:53 | 22:02 -01:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 26:37 | 05:16 +00:10 | 26:51 -00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:34 | 32:03 | 05:08 -00:34 | 32:07 -00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 36:37 | 05:26 -00:05 | 37:15 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 41:58 | 04:46 +00:04 | 42:41 -00:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 46:48 | 05:18 -00:02 | 47:27 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 52:04 | 02:09 -00:02 | 52:45 -00:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 54:11 | 05:17 +00:06 | 54:54 -00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 59:34 | 04:58 -00:36 | 01:00:11 -00:37 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:03:56 | 05:52 +00:14 | 01:05:09 -01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:54 | 01:10:02 | 06:16 +00:38 | 01:11:01 -00:59 |
| Roxzone | 07:07 | 01:23:55 | 06:38 +00:29 | 01:23:55 |
Based on the results from the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, it's clear that Chase Mcdaniel has demonstrated a robust performance. He ranked within the top 23% of 1404 athletes and within the top 26% of his age group (25-29). His total running time was faster than average by 01:24 which indicates that he has a strong runner profile. However, his total time in the Roxzone was slower than average, suggesting a need for improvement in transition times and overall fitness.
Chase started the race strong, with his time in Running 1 being 01:14 faster than average, placing him in the 3rd percentile. However, there was a noticeable drop in performance in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, where he was slower than the average. This could be due to an overemphasis on running in his training, leading to a deficit in strength-based exercises.
Chase should consider pacing himself more effectively throughout the race. While his initial running segments were faster than average, his speed dropped in later segments. This could be due to starting out too fast and not having enough energy reserves for the remainder of the race. Implementing a steady pace strategy might help conserve energy for the more demanding segments later in the race.
Given his strength in running, Chase could also strategize to maximize this advantage. By maintaining a consistent and fast pace in the running segments, he may be able to offset some time lost in the strength-based segments. However, this should be balanced with ensuring he has enough energy and strength for the entire race.
Lastly, focusing on improving his transition times and reducing rest times between segments can also help improve his overall time. This can be achieved through targeted fitness training and practicing quick transitions during training sessions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Höltgen Carlo | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:24:08 | |
| Van Wyk Gerhard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:48 | |
| Bermond Jeremy | 2023 Paris | 01:23:59 | |
| Gerke Falk | 2019 Hannover | 01:24:02 | |
| Gunn Kyle | 2023 Melbourne | 01:23:47 | |
| Rapp Alexander | 2021 Leipzig | 01:24:17 | |
| Mcdaid James | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:06 | |
| King Daniel | 2024 Katowice | 01:24:04 | |
| Danhiez Anthony | 2024 Paris | 01:23:46 | |
| Kmosko Peter | 2018 Wien | 01:24:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
