Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Oberhausen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Höltgen Carlo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Höltgen Carlo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Höltgen Carlo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Höltgen Carlo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:47 | 45:46 to 40:59 | 95.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 06:07 to 05:53 | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:28 to 01:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:22 to 03:22 | 0.0% |
| Höltgen Carlo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 05:05 | 04:25 -00:11 | 04:34 +00:31 |
| Running 2 | 05:39 | 09:19 | 04:53 +00:46 | 08:59 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 01:46 | 14:58 | 02:52 -01:06 | 13:52 +01:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 16:44 | 05:19 +00:49 | 16:44 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 22:52 | 04:50 -00:49 | 22:03 +00:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:40 | 26:53 | 05:17 +00:23 | 26:53 +00:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 32:33 | 05:11 -00:38 | 32:10 +00:23 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 37:06 | 05:27 +00:20 | 37:21 -00:15 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 42:53 | 04:47 -00:17 | 42:48 +00:05 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 47:23 | 05:19 +00:37 | 47:35 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:28 | 53:19 | 02:08 -00:40 | 52:54 +00:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:47 | 54:47 | 05:18 +00:29 | 55:02 -00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:22 | 01:00:34 | 04:59 -01:37 | 01:00:20 +00:14 |
| Running 8 | 05:49 | 01:03:56 | 05:53 -00:04 | 01:05:19 -01:23 |
| Wall Balls | 06:07 | 01:09:45 | 06:18 -00:11 | 01:11:12 -01:27 |
| Roxzone | 08:27 | 01:24:08 | 06:38 +01:49 | 01:24:08 |
Pacing and Profile:
Carlo's total running time of 00:45:46 is 05:07 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running abilities. While his best running lap of 00:05:05 is impressive, his splits in Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 are slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to work on his speed and endurance in order to improve his overall running performance.
In conclusion, Carlo Höltgen performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his running abilities, practicing efficient transitions, incorporating strength training, and implementing interval training sessions, Carlo can improve his overall race performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gibbs Will | 2024 Malaga | 01:23:52 | |
| Mursean Emanuel | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:09 | |
| Vitols Reinis | 2023 Manchester | 01:23:40 | |
| Franz Andre | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:59 | |
| Karim Naoun | 2023 Barcelona | 01:23:52 | |
| Hearn Stu | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:25 | |
| Castellano Carmona Jesús | 2021 Madrid | 01:24:28 | |
| Crisp Max | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:24:38 | |
| Benitez Francisco | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:24:20 | |
| Petrov Dmytro | 2022 Hamburg | 01:24:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 Hannover | 01:27:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
