Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ledger Katie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ledger Katie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ledger Katie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ledger Katie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:15 | 47:56 to 45:41 | 59.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:53 | 03:30 to 02:37 | 23.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:27 to 02:09 | 8.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 05:21 to 05:04 | 7.5% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:22 to 05:19 | 1.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:48 to 05:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Ledger Katie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:36 | 00:00 | 05:10 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:21 | 04:36 | 05:09 +00:12 | 05:10 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 09:57 | 05:32 +00:20 | 10:19 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:30 | 15:49 | 02:48 +00:42 | 15:51 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 19:19 | 05:52 +00:03 | 18:39 +00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 05:18 | 25:14 | 05:52 -00:34 | 24:31 +00:43 |
| Running 4 | 06:08 | 30:32 | 05:52 +00:16 | 30:23 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 36:40 | 06:14 -00:26 | 36:15 +00:25 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 42:28 | 06:00 +00:31 | 42:29 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 48:59 | 05:25 -00:03 | 48:29 +00:30 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 54:21 | 05:54 +00:09 | 53:54 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 01:00:24 | 02:16 +00:11 | 59:48 +00:36 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 01:02:51 | 05:53 +00:30 | 01:02:04 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 01:09:14 | 04:53 -00:28 | 01:07:57 +01:17 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:13:39 | 06:19 +00:12 | 01:12:50 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 03:45 | 01:20:10 | 05:00 -01:15 | 01:19:09 +01:01 |
| Roxzone | 07:24 | 01:31:12 | 07:03 +00:21 | 01:31:12 |
Based on the splits analysis, Katie's running performance was generally strong, with several segments being faster than average. However, there were areas where she lost time, such as the Ski Erg, Running 2, Sled Push, Running 4, Running 5, and Roxzone. These segments will be the focus of the improvement strategies outlined below.
To optimize her performance, Katie should also consider tailoring her training based on her profile. Since her total running time was slower than average, she should prioritize training her running abilities. This can include incorporating longer distance runs, interval training, and speed work into her training routine. Additionally, she can benefit from strength training exercises to improve her overall strength and power, which will contribute to her running performance.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the specific areas for improvement, Katie Ledger can enhance her performance in future HYROX races and continue to excel in her age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jetzer Eliza | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:31:02 | |
| Henn Sabrina | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:31:33 | |
| Köppen Eva | 2022 Essen | 01:31:38 | |
| Dawson Nicola | 2024 London | 01:31:24 | |
| Björkqvist Caroline | 2024 Stockholm | 01:31:03 | |
| Ferreira Raquel | 2021 Madrid | 01:31:15 | |
| Kenny Lydia | 2024 London | 01:30:52 | |
| Desborough Joanne | 2023 London | 01:30:59 | |
| Walker Lucy | 2024 London | 01:31:32 | |
| Wille Lisa | 2023 München | 01:30:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:30:41 | |
| 2022 London | 01:33:11 | |
| 2022 London | 01:38:11 | |
| 2024 London | 01:34:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
