Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Warner Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Warner Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Warner Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Warner Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:55 | 07:04 to 05:09 | 68.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 07:00 to 06:30 | 17.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:20 | 05:44 to 05:24 | 11.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:57 to 02:53 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:34 to 42:34 | 0.0% |
| Warner Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:50 | 00:00 | 04:46 +01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 05:50 | 04:30 -00:10 | 04:46 +01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 10:10 | 05:07 -00:07 | 09:16 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 15:10 | 03:03 -00:06 | 14:23 +00:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 18:07 | 05:36 -00:35 | 17:26 +00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 03:41 | 23:08 | 05:12 -01:31 | 23:02 +00:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 26:49 | 05:35 -00:17 | 28:14 -01:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:44 | 32:07 | 05:42 +00:02 | 33:49 -01:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:17 | 37:51 | 05:47 -00:30 | 39:31 -01:40 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 43:08 | 04:54 -00:17 | 45:18 -02:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 47:45 | 05:36 -00:14 | 50:12 -02:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 53:07 | 02:17 -00:07 | 55:48 -02:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 55:17 | 05:35 -00:20 | 58:05 -02:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:04 | 01:00:32 | 05:26 +01:38 | 01:03:40 -03:08 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:07:36 | 06:17 -00:43 | 01:09:06 -01:30 |
| Wall Balls | 07:00 | 01:13:10 | 06:55 +00:05 | 01:15:23 -02:13 |
| Roxzone | 09:40 | 01:29:43 | 07:25 +02:15 | 01:29:43 |
Thomas Warner delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, placing in the top 40% overall and top 39% within his age group. His total running time was notably 2 minutes and 9 seconds faster than the average, suggesting a strong running profile. However, the slower opening segment (Running 1) indicates a potentially cautious start, while subsequent segments up to Running 4 show a consistent pace improvement, suggesting an effective strategy of gaining momentum as the race progressed. Nevertheless, Thomas's Roxzone time indicates a need for improved transitions and overall fitness to enhance performance in non-running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Otto Florian | 2021 Berlin | 01:30:04 | |
| Westermann Kristian | 2024 Köln | 01:29:28 | |
| Gil Alejandro | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:30 | |
| Levine Scott | 2023 Dallas | 01:29:48 | |
| Ruiz Ortega Jose Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:58 | |
| Sharka Igli | 2024 Rimini | 01:29:27 | |
| Cook Alexander | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:19 | |
| Wathan Rhys | 2022 London | 01:30:01 | |
| Lamprey Jason | 2024 Perth | 01:29:59 | |
| Schött Dominik | 2019 Hannover | 01:29:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:36:43 | |
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
