Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 387 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Swarts Jan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Swarts Jan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Swarts Jan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Swarts Jan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 18:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 18:46 | 01:13:37 to 54:51 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:22 to 06:22 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:33 to 07:33 | 0.0% |
| Swarts Jan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:28 | 00:00 | 05:34 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 04:28 | 04:54 -00:05 | 05:34 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 09:31 | 09:17 | 06:21 +03:10 | 10:28 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 18:48 | 04:01 -01:36 | 16:49 +01:59 |
| Running 3 | 09:40 | 21:13 | 07:14 +02:26 | 20:50 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 30:53 | 07:08 -02:37 | 28:04 +02:49 |
| Running 4 | 09:58 | 35:24 | 07:13 +02:45 | 35:12 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:22 | 45:22 | 08:20 -01:58 | 42:25 +02:57 |
| Running 5 | 10:06 | 51:44 | 07:42 +02:24 | 50:45 +00:59 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 01:01:50 | 05:31 -00:40 | 58:27 +03:23 |
| Running 6 | 09:50 | 01:06:41 | 07:16 +02:34 | 01:03:58 +02:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 01:16:31 | 02:56 -00:43 | 01:11:14 +05:17 |
| Running 7 | 09:56 | 01:18:44 | 07:19 +02:37 | 01:14:10 +04:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:27 | 01:28:40 | 07:48 -02:21 | 01:21:29 +07:11 |
| Running 8 | 10:11 | 01:34:07 | 09:21 +00:50 | 01:29:17 +04:50 |
| Wall Balls | 07:33 | 01:44:18 | 09:57 -02:24 | 01:38:38 +05:40 |
| Roxzone | 08:00 | 01:59:43 | 11:08 -03:08 | 01:59:43 |
Jan's total running time was 01:13:37, which was 17:46 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and his transition time in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:04:28, which was 00:49 faster than average. This indicates that he has good running ability and should focus on harnessing this strength.
In conclusion, Jan Swarts had a solid performance in the HYROX race, with strengths in running and room for improvement in specific segments. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transition time, and specific running segments, he can enhance his performance in future races. Implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as endurance training, strength training, hill training, and form correction drills, will help him reach his full potential.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Prandzioch Matthias | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:59:49 | |
| Blair Robbie | 2023 Sydney | 01:59:36 | |
| Mckenna Stevie | 2023 Dublin | 01:59:49 | |
| Prange Niklas | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:59:56 | |
| Hoedeman Colin | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:00:08 | |
| Bong Kenny | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:00:08 | |
| Oostveen Sven | 2024 Rotterdam | 02:00:05 | |
| Fitzmaurice Declan | 2023 Dublin | 01:59:31 | |
| Diesterbeck Richard | 2018 Hamburg | 02:00:06 | |
| Gobernack Meik | 2023 Hannover | 02:00:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
