Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Oliver James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Oliver James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Oliver James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Oliver James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:48 | 40:07 to 36:19 | 70.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 02:39 to 02:10 | 8.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:24 | 02:05 to 01:41 | 7.4% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:41 to 04:26 | 4.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:15 | 05:03 to 04:48 | 4.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 04:03 to 03:49 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Oliver James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 04:08 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:58 | 04:13 | 04:15 -00:17 | 04:08 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 08:11 | 04:25 +00:08 | 08:23 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 12:44 | 02:32 +00:07 | 12:48 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 15:23 | 04:46 +00:17 | 15:20 +00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 03:41 | 20:26 | 04:09 -00:28 | 20:06 +00:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 24:07 | 04:44 +00:23 | 24:15 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:03 | 29:14 | 04:19 -00:16 | 28:59 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 33:17 | 04:52 +00:34 | 33:18 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 38:43 | 04:33 +00:08 | 38:10 +00:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 43:24 | 04:46 +00:17 | 42:43 +00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 48:27 | 01:53 +00:12 | 47:29 +00:58 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 50:32 | 04:45 +00:29 | 49:22 +01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:44 | 55:46 | 04:17 -00:33 | 54:07 +01:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:32 | 59:30 | 05:06 +00:26 | 58:24 +01:06 |
| Wall Balls | 05:03 | 01:05:02 | 05:23 -00:20 | 01:03:30 +01:32 |
| Roxzone | 04:21 | 01:14:18 | 05:25 -01:04 | 01:14:18 |
In terms of his splits, James performed well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, finishing 13 seconds faster than average in both. He also had a strong performance in the Sled Pull, finishing 46 seconds faster than average. These segments highlight his strength and power, indicating that he has a solid foundation in these areas.
However, there were several segments where James lost time compared to the average. The segments with the most time lost were Running Total, Running 5, Running 7, Running 4, Best Lap, Running 6, Running 3, Running 8, Running 1, and Rowing. These segments indicate areas where James can focus on improving his performance.
10. Rowing: James' time in Rowing was 00:12 slower than average. To improve this segment, James should focus on improving his rowing technique and endurance. Incorporating rowing intervals and rowing-specific drills into his training routine can help improve his rowing performance and overall endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Solomon Richard | 2023 Manchester | 01:14:00 | |
| Durandt Luc | 2024 Manchester | 01:14:04 | |
| Halls Andrew | 2023 London | 01:14:04 | |
| Palenik Pawel | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:14:20 | |
| Gerard Maxence | 2024 Berlin | 01:14:12 | |
| Mohammad Bestun Ali | 2024 Dublin | 01:14:16 | |
| Crossan Philip | 2024 Dublin | 01:13:53 | |
| Ballario Ivan | 2024 Turin | 01:14:04 | |
| Tracey Carl | 2023 Madrid | 01:14:46 | |
| Sitek Simon | 2023 Wien | 01:14:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
