Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jones Zac's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jones Zac's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jones Zac's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jones Zac's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:25 | 43:54 to 41:29 | 48.3% |
| Sled Pull | 02:05 | 06:41 to 04:36 | 41.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 05:12 to 04:48 | 8.0% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:47 to 04:43 | 1.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:04 to 02:02 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Jones Zac | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:49 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 04:49 | 04:26 -00:07 | 04:35 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 09:08 | 04:56 -00:04 | 09:01 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 14:00 | 02:51 -00:30 | 13:57 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 16:21 | 05:22 +00:01 | 16:48 -00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 06:41 | 21:44 | 04:53 +01:48 | 22:10 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 28:25 | 05:20 +00:11 | 27:03 +01:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:38 | 33:56 | 05:17 -00:39 | 32:23 +01:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 38:34 | 05:31 +00:04 | 37:40 +00:54 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 44:09 | 04:48 -00:01 | 43:11 +00:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:42 | 48:56 | 05:22 +00:20 | 47:59 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 54:38 | 02:10 -00:06 | 53:21 +01:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 56:42 | 05:21 +00:20 | 55:31 +01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:12 | 01:02:23 | 05:04 +00:08 | 01:00:52 +01:31 |
| Running 8 | 06:25 | 01:07:35 | 05:57 +00:28 | 01:05:56 +01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 04:44 | 01:14:00 | 06:28 -01:44 | 01:11:53 +02:07 |
| Roxzone | 06:31 | 01:25:06 | 06:45 -00:14 | 01:25:06 |
Zac Jones delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, finishing in the top 29% overall and top 27% in his age group (16-24). His total time of 01:25:06 indicates a solid execution, particularly in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls, where he excelled significantly. However, the total running time of 00:43:54 was slightly slower than average, suggesting potential gains in running efficiency. Zac seems to exhibit a strength-oriented profile, given his superior performance in strength-related segments compared to running. His pacing in the initial runs was conservative, avoiding an overly fast start which helped sustain performance across the event.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bojanic Stipe | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:52 | |
| Simons Bas | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:36 | |
| Nijveldt Niels | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:25:34 | |
| Butler Jason | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:42 | |
| Latorre Matt | 2021 Birmingham | 01:24:44 | |
| Van Bergen Calleja Pablo | 2023 Madrid | 01:25:32 | |
| Vianello Riccardo | 2024 Rimini | 01:25:01 | |
| Lamanna Francesco | 2024 Milan | 01:25:07 | |
| Danielsson Joakim | 2024 Stockholm | 01:24:37 | |
| Günster Florian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:25:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:32:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
