Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
970 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 970 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 970 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Elliot Jem's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Elliot Jem's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 970 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Elliot Jem's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Elliot Jem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
03:56.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 970 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Jem Elliot's performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX Race was commendable, with an overall rank of 403 out of 2328 athletes. This places him in the top 17% of all participants and in the top 13% of his age group (40-44). Elliot's total running time of 00:49:01 was 00:16 faster than the average, indicating a strength in running speed. This is further supported by his best running lap of 00:05:55.
Despite starting slower in the first couple of runs, he progressively improved his pace. This suggests a well-executed strategy to conserve energy in the initial stages, which helped him to maintain a faster pace towards the end of the race. His overall profile leans more towards running, but he also demonstrated good strength performance in some segments.
Segments to Improve:
Wall Balls:
Elliot's performance in the Wall Balls segment was significantly slower than the average (by 01:18), indicating a need for improvement. Incorporating strength training with a focus on lower-body power and upper-body control will help. Specific exercises might include thrusters, kettlebell swings, and medicine ball throws to mimic the movement and improve technique.
Sled Pull:
Another segment where improvement could be made is the Sled Pull, where Elliot performed 00:53 slower than average. Training should focus on improving leg strength and grip. Deadlifts, weighted squats, and grip-enhancing exercises like farmer's walks will be beneficial. Practicing the actual sled pull movement will also help in improving technique.
Ski Erg:
Elliot was slower than average in the Ski Erg segment by 00:10. To improve this, he should work on his upper body strength and endurance. Exercises like pull-ups, push-ups, and rowing can help. Interval training on the Ski Erg machine will also enhance performance in this segment.
Race Strategies:
A more aggressive start might help Elliot gain some initial ground without adversely affecting his overall pacing strategy. Given his strength in later running segments, pushing a bit harder in the initial running stages could benefit his overall timing.
During strength exercises, focusing on maintaining good form and efficiency might help save time. For instance, in the Wall Balls and Sled Pull segments, aiming for smoother, more controlled movements may help reduce fatigue and improve speed.
Elliot should also consider incorporating some active recovery techniques in the Roxzone to ensure he's maximising his rest and recovery in between segments. This could be as simple as deep, controlled breathing or light stretching to help prepare for the next segment.