Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:03 (From 42:20 to 40:17) | 46.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:48 (From 06:31 to 05:43) | 18.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:46 (From 05:21 to 04:35) | 17.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 (From 04:42 to 04:25) | 6.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 (From 02:48 to 02:34) | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 (From 04:29 to 04:19) | 3.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 (From 02:01 to 01:57) | 1.5% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:19 to 04:19) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:30 to 04:30) | 0.0% |
| Banks Jonathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:03 | 00:00 | 04:30 -00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:03 | 04:24 +00:05 | 04:30 -00:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 08:32 | 04:50 +00:27 | 08:54 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 13:49 | 02:49 -00:01 | 13:44 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 16:37 | 05:13 +00:08 | 16:33 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:42 | 21:58 | 04:45 -00:03 | 21:46 +00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 26:40 | 05:11 +00:20 | 26:31 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:19 | 32:11 | 05:01 -00:42 | 31:42 +00:29 |
| Running 5 | 05:39 | 36:30 | 05:21 +00:18 | 36:43 -00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 42:09 | 04:44 -00:14 | 42:04 +00:05 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 46:39 | 05:14 +00:16 | 46:48 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 52:09 | 02:07 -00:06 | 52:02 +00:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 54:10 | 05:12 +00:07 | 54:09 +00:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 59:29 | 04:51 +00:30 | 59:21 +00:08 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:04:50 | 05:43 +00:01 | 01:04:12 +00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 06:31 | 01:10:34 | 06:14 +00:17 | 01:09:55 +00:39 |
| Roxzone | 05:36 | 01:22:33 | 06:24 -00:48 | 01:22:33 |
In terms of pacing, Jonathan's overall running time of 00:42:20 was 02:49 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may have rested more or took more time during the transition zones (roxzone). To improve this segment, Jonathan should focus on improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition time.
Segment Analysis:
1. Sandbag Lunges: Jonathan's time of 00:05:21 for the Sandbag Lunges segment was 00:33 slower than average. This segment was one of the areas where he lost the most time. To improve this segment, Jonathan should focus on developing strength and endurance in his legs through exercises such as squats, lunges, and step-ups. Additionally, he should practice proper technique and form during lunges to optimize his performance.
2. Running 2: Jonathan's time of 00:05:17 for the second running segment was 00:29 slower than average. This suggests that he may need to work on his running speed and endurance. To improve this segment, Jonathan should incorporate interval training and speed work into his running routine. He can also consider adding hill sprints and tempo runs to build both strength and speed.
3. Running 5: Jonathan's time of 00:05:39 for the fifth running segment was 00:20 slower than average. Similar to the previous running segment, he could benefit from improving his running speed and endurance. Interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs can all help him improve his performance in this segment.
4. Running 4: Jonathan's time of 00:05:31 for the fourth running segment was 00:19 slower than average. To improve this segment, he should focus on building endurance and speed through interval training, tempo runs, and long-distance runs. Incorporating strength training exercises such as squats and deadlifts can also help him improve his running performance.
5. Running 6: Jonathan's time of 00:05:30 for the sixth running segment was 00:18 slower than average. Similar to the previous running segments, he should work on improving his running speed and endurance through interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs. Strengthening exercises for the lower body can also be beneficial.
6. Wall Balls: Jonathan's time of 00:06:31 for the Wall Balls segment was 00:17 slower than average. To improve this segment, he should focus on developing upper body strength and endurance. Incorporating exercises such as push-ups, shoulder presses, and medicine ball throws can help improve his performance in this segment.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Jonathan Banks can improve his performance in future Hyrox races and achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Molloy Liam | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:26 | |
| Collins Nathan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:37 | |
| Sender Mickael | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:22:49 | |
| Sterken Erik | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:22:21 | |
| Viu Alvaro | 2021 Madrid | 01:22:44 | |
| Buchanan Sean | 2024 London | 01:22:33 | |
| Bowers David | 2022 London | 01:22:33 | |
| Bouazzat Romain | 2024 Paris | 01:22:39 | |
| Mckee Shane | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:01 | |
| Cox Andrew | 2023 Manchester | 01:22:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Banks Jonathan
