Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Köln using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tillack Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tillack Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tillack Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tillack Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:50 | 39:03 to 35:13 | 78.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 03:57 to 03:35 | 7.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 03:50 to 03:34 | 5.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 03:59 to 03:44 | 5.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:07 | 04:42 to 04:35 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 02:06 to 02:03 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:06 to 04:04 | 0.7% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:18 to 01:18 | 0.0% |
| Tillack Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:37 | 00:00 | 04:02 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 03:37 | 04:13 -00:07 | 04:02 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 07:43 | 04:20 +00:41 | 08:15 -00:32 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 12:44 | 02:27 -00:21 | 12:35 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 14:50 | 04:38 +00:33 | 15:02 -00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 03:50 | 20:01 | 04:01 -00:11 | 19:40 +00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 23:51 | 04:37 +00:39 | 23:41 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:57 | 29:07 | 04:07 -00:10 | 28:18 +00:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 33:04 | 04:45 +00:37 | 32:25 +00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:16 | 38:26 | 04:30 -00:14 | 37:10 +01:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 42:42 | 04:39 +00:39 | 41:40 +01:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:18 | 48:00 | 01:49 -00:31 | 46:19 +01:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 49:18 | 04:37 +00:39 | 48:08 +01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:59 | 54:34 | 04:07 -00:08 | 52:45 +01:49 |
| Running 8 | 04:05 | 58:33 | 04:59 -00:54 | 56:52 +01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 04:42 | 01:02:38 | 05:11 -00:29 | 01:01:51 +00:47 |
| Roxzone | 05:02 | 01:12:14 | 05:12 -00:10 | 01:12:14 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, Patrick Tillack's pacing was consistent throughout the race, with some segments being faster or slower than average. His best running lap was particularly impressive, being 19 seconds faster than average. This suggests that he has a strong running profile. However, his total running time was 02:48 slower than average, indicating that he could benefit from additional training in this area.
Overall, Patrick Tillack showed great potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, incorporating targeted training strategies, and implementing effective race strategies, he can continue to excel and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Knudsen Mattis | 2024 Hamburg | 01:11:46 | |
| Muñoz Gutiérrez Jose Antonio | 2023 Valencia | 01:11:46 | |
| Schwerin Adrian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:12:08 | |
| Schuhmann Jan | 2018 Hamburg | 01:12:23 | |
| Blain Anthony | 2023 Paris | 01:11:46 | |
| Mccourtie Thomas | 2023 London | 01:12:13 | |
| Ries Fabian | 2023 Köln | 01:12:36 | |
| O Shea Michael Casey | 2022 London | 01:12:43 | |
| Forrester Will | 2024 Perth | 01:11:59 | |
| Freixeda Carlos | 2024 Paris | 01:12:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen | 01:18:10 | |
| 2022 Frankfurt | 01:19:11 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:15:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
