Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 771 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stief Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stief Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stief Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stief Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:23 | 52:13 to 49:50 | 50.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:22 | 08:24 to 07:02 | 29.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 05:58 to 05:22 | 12.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 05:39 to 05:18 | 7.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 03:01 to 03:00 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:04 to 06:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Stief Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:38 | 00:00 | 05:27 -01:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:39 | 03:38 | 05:20 +00:19 | 05:27 -01:49 |
| Running 2 | 05:57 | 09:17 | 06:00 -00:03 | 10:47 -01:30 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 15:14 | 03:05 -00:04 | 16:47 -01:33 |
| Running 3 | 06:38 | 18:15 | 06:23 +00:15 | 19:52 -01:37 |
| Sled Pull | 06:04 | 24:53 | 06:32 -00:28 | 26:15 -01:22 |
| Running 4 | 06:40 | 30:57 | 06:26 +00:14 | 32:47 -01:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:24 | 37:37 | 07:14 +01:10 | 39:13 -01:36 |
| Running 5 | 07:54 | 46:01 | 06:35 +01:19 | 46:27 -00:26 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 53:55 | 05:38 -00:14 | 53:02 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 07:01 | 59:19 | 06:28 +00:33 | 58:40 +00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 01:06:20 | 02:29 -00:11 | 01:05:08 +01:12 |
| Running 7 | 07:00 | 01:08:38 | 06:27 +00:33 | 01:07:37 +01:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:58 | 01:15:38 | 05:34 +00:24 | 01:14:04 +01:34 |
| Running 8 | 07:28 | 01:21:36 | 07:09 +00:19 | 01:19:38 +01:58 |
| Wall Balls | 05:23 | 01:29:04 | 05:50 -00:27 | 01:26:47 +02:17 |
| Roxzone | 06:30 | 01:40:50 | 08:13 -01:43 | 01:40:50 |
Sarah's total running time of 00:52:13 was 02:49 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, her best running lap of 00:03:38 was 01:36 faster than average, indicating that she has the potential to excel in running with the proper training.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training exercises and drills, Sarah Stief can improve her performance in future Hyrox races. With a focus on enhancing her running performance, improving her transitions, and developing mental resilience, she has the potential to achieve even better results in her age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Singer Amanda | 2023 London | 01:41:00 | |
| Goemaere Dolores | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:40:59 | |
| Molloy Felicity | 2022 Birmingham | 01:40:29 | |
| Rahman Farhana | 2022 London | 01:41:20 | |
| Arjatsalo Jenni | 2022 Berlin | 01:41:10 | |
| Lee Emily | 2024 Incheon | 01:40:35 | |
| Co Stejorry Maelin | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:41:09 | |
| Aalto Sanna | 2024 Milan | 01:41:06 | |
| Marmina Madison | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:41:15 | |
| Bennett Brenna | 2024 Dallas | 01:40:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
