Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nicholson Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nicholson Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nicholson Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nicholson Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:01 | 43:52 to 42:51 | 26.5% |
| Sled Pull | 01:00 | 05:51 to 04:51 | 26.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:47 | 05:50 to 05:03 | 20.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:38 | 02:45 to 02:07 | 16.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:24 | 05:41 to 05:17 | 10.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Nicholson Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:01 | 00:00 | 04:43 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 05:01 | 04:29 -00:09 | 04:43 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 09:21 | 05:06 +00:04 | 09:12 +00:09 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 14:31 | 02:59 -00:35 | 14:18 +00:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 16:55 | 05:33 +00:03 | 17:17 -00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 22:31 | 05:05 +00:46 | 22:50 -00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 28:22 | 05:32 +00:11 | 27:55 +00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:41 | 34:05 | 05:37 +00:04 | 33:27 +00:38 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 39:46 | 05:43 -00:06 | 39:04 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 45:23 | 04:52 -00:05 | 44:47 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 50:10 | 05:34 -00:01 | 49:39 +00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:45 | 55:43 | 02:15 +00:30 | 55:13 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 58:28 | 05:33 -00:17 | 57:28 +01:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:50 | 01:03:44 | 05:21 +00:29 | 01:03:01 +00:43 |
| Running 8 | 05:59 | 01:09:34 | 06:13 -00:14 | 01:08:22 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:15:33 | 06:48 -01:02 | 01:14:35 +00:58 |
| Roxzone | 07:20 | 01:28:30 | 07:07 +00:13 | 01:28:30 |
Scott Nicholson delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 637, placing him in the top 35% of all competitors. Within his age group of 30-34, he ranked 153rd. His total time was 1:28:30, with a total running time of 43:52, which was 28 seconds faster than the average. This indicates a strong running capability, suggesting that Scott has a runner's profile. His running performance was particularly commendable, with consistent improvement in running segments as the race progressed. However, the initial segment indicates a slightly slower start compared to the average, suggesting a cautious approach. Overall, Scott's strength lies in his running, while there is room for improvement in certain strength-based exercises and transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Daran Fabien | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:28:47 | |
| Rathmanner Jürgen | 2023 Wien | 01:28:16 | |
| Hausch Sebastian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:28:30 | |
| Feighney James | 2023 Malmö | 01:28:45 | |
| Schulte Sasse Dominik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:09 | |
| Patris Norman | 2023 Paris | 01:28:10 | |
| Dickenson Jacob | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:25 | |
| Geyer Florian | 2022 Bremen | 01:28:24 | |
| Uzulis Martins | 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:11 | |
| Ward Dan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Perth | 01:29:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
