Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcadam Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcadam Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcadam Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcadam Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:46 | 51:51 to 46:05 | 90.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 05:47 to 05:26 | 5.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:36 to 02:22 | 3.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:47 to 05:47 | 0.0% |
| Mcadam Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:53 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:53 | 04:36 -00:07 | 04:58 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 03:25 | 09:22 | 05:24 -01:59 | 09:34 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 12:47 | 03:14 -00:15 | 14:58 -02:11 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 15:46 | 05:53 +00:12 | 18:12 -02:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:47 | 21:51 | 05:37 +00:10 | 24:05 -02:14 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 27:38 | 05:54 +00:16 | 29:42 -02:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:20 | 33:48 | 06:20 -02:00 | 35:36 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 06:23 | 38:08 | 06:08 +00:15 | 41:56 -03:48 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 44:31 | 05:03 -00:09 | 48:04 -03:33 |
| Running 6 | 06:21 | 49:25 | 05:56 +00:25 | 53:07 -03:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 55:46 | 02:26 +00:10 | 59:03 -03:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:24 | 58:22 | 05:55 +00:29 | 01:01:29 -03:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:31 | 01:04:46 | 05:54 -00:23 | 01:07:24 -02:38 |
| Running 8 | 07:14 | 01:10:17 | 06:48 +00:26 | 01:13:18 -03:01 |
| Wall Balls | 05:47 | 01:17:31 | 07:41 -01:54 | 01:20:06 -02:35 |
| Roxzone | 12:49 | 01:35:59 | 08:12 +04:37 | 01:35:59 |
Based on his splits analysis, it is evident that Daniel's running performance is a strength for him. His total running time of 00:51:51 is 06:20 slower than average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. It is also worth noting that his best running lap time of 00:08:25 is a strong indicator of his running ability.
In summary, Daniel Mcadam has shown strong running ability in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition time, and implementing specific training strategies, he can further excel in future races. Incorporating interval training, speed work, and practicing quick transitions will help him optimize his performance. Additionally, maintaining a consistent and sustainable pace, visualizing success, and setting specific goals will contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Benzin Janik | 2023 München | 01:36:02 | |
| Mens Storm | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:41 | |
| Whitewick Mark | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:36 | |
| Ball Andrew | 2023 London | 01:35:29 | |
| Janssen Kasper | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:38 | |
| Sagorny Sebastian | 2022 Essen | 01:36:27 | |
| Van Jaarsveld Koen | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:36:26 | |
| Cube Tony | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:19 | |
| Andersen Christian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:36:01 | |
| Felger Mathias | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:35:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
