Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 738 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Koudijs Dennis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Koudijs Dennis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Koudijs Dennis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Koudijs Dennis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:40 | 09:02 to 07:22 | 36.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:16 | 04:03 to 02:47 | 27.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:00 | 07:28 to 06:28 | 21.6% |
| Run Total | 00:37 | 52:14 to 51:37 | 13.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:23 to 05:19 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:51 to 04:50 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:40 to 06:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:27 to 08:27 | 0.0% |
| Koudijs Dennis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:10 | 00:00 | 05:25 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 05:10 | 04:47 +00:04 | 05:25 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 10:01 | 06:02 -00:42 | 10:12 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 15:21 | 03:44 -00:40 | 16:14 -00:53 |
| Running 3 | 06:16 | 18:25 | 06:42 -00:26 | 19:58 -01:33 |
| Sled Pull | 07:28 | 24:41 | 06:33 +00:55 | 26:40 -01:59 |
| Running 4 | 07:04 | 32:09 | 06:42 +00:22 | 33:13 -01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:02 | 39:13 | 07:32 +01:30 | 39:55 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 06:56 | 48:15 | 06:59 -00:03 | 47:27 +00:48 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 55:11 | 05:21 +00:02 | 54:26 +00:45 |
| Running 6 | 06:15 | 01:00:34 | 06:45 -00:30 | 59:47 +00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:03 | 01:06:49 | 02:46 +01:17 | 01:06:32 +00:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:28 | 01:10:52 | 06:50 -00:22 | 01:09:18 +01:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:40 | 01:17:20 | 06:59 -00:19 | 01:16:08 +01:12 |
| Running 8 | 08:49 | 01:24:00 | 08:23 +00:26 | 01:23:07 +00:53 |
| Wall Balls | 08:27 | 01:32:49 | 09:09 -00:42 | 01:31:30 +01:19 |
| Roxzone | 09:44 | 01:50:52 | 10:13 -00:29 | 01:50:52 |
Dennis had a solid running performance, with a total running time of 00:52:14, which was faster than the average. His best running lap was completed in 00:05:10. However, he was slightly slower than average in the Running 1 segment, taking 3 seconds longer than the average time. Overall, his running performance was a strength in this race.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested exercises and training routines, Dennis can enhance his performance in the identified areas for improvement and continue to improve his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mccormack Kevin | 2024 Dublin | 01:50:42 | |
| Huang Yi Chien HKGHYROX | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:51:05 | |
| Mörk Alexander | 2024 Stockholm | 01:51:09 | |
| Achterberg Peter | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:51:13 | |
| Suprapto Irza | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:50:54 | |
| Green Joe | 2024 Birmingham | 01:50:37 | |
| Mansor Amr | 2023 Barcelona | 01:50:58 | |
| Johnson Scott | 2024 Brisbane | 01:51:22 | |
| Jones Sion Derfel | 2023 Birmingham | 01:50:23 | |
| Schepis Wayne | 2024 Melbourne | 01:50:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
