Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Mitch's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Mitch's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Mitch's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Mitch's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:36 | 07:24 to 05:48 | 36.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:19 | 06:52 to 05:33 | 29.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:19 | 03:44 to 02:25 | 29.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 03:23 to 03:15 | 3.0% |
| Run Total | 00:03 | 46:48 to 46:45 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:00 to 07:00 | 0.0% |
| Smith Mitch | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:26 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:26 | 04:38 -00:06 | 04:59 -01:33 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 07:58 | 05:26 -00:08 | 09:37 -01:39 |
| Sled Push | 03:23 | 13:16 | 03:18 +00:05 | 15:03 -01:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 16:39 | 05:59 -00:18 | 18:21 -01:42 |
| Sled Pull | 06:52 | 22:20 | 05:41 +01:11 | 24:20 -02:00 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 29:12 | 05:57 +00:04 | 30:01 -00:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 35:13 | 06:25 -01:22 | 35:58 -00:45 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 40:16 | 06:13 -00:06 | 42:23 -02:07 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 46:23 | 05:04 -00:03 | 48:36 -02:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:36 | 51:24 | 06:02 +00:34 | 53:40 -02:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:44 | 58:00 | 02:26 +01:18 | 59:42 -01:42 |
| Running 7 | 06:39 | 01:01:44 | 06:01 +00:38 | 01:02:08 -00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:24 | 01:08:23 | 05:59 +01:25 | 01:08:09 +00:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:15:47 | 06:59 +00:05 | 01:14:08 +01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 07:00 | 01:22:51 | 07:52 -00:52 | 01:21:07 +01:44 |
| Roxzone | 07:36 | 01:37:17 | 08:18 -00:42 | 01:37:17 |
Mitch Smith delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, placing in the top 42% overall and top 48% in his age category. His total running time was notably faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, his initial running segments suggest he might have started too fast, as evidenced by a significant slowdown in later running segments. While his running capability is above average, some strength segments and transitions indicate room for improvement to achieve a more balanced performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nash Matthew | 2023 Dubai | 01:37:08 | |
| Wedekind Arnoud | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:55 | |
| Davis Kelvin | 2023 Anaheim | 01:37:16 | |
| Krejci Scott | 2021 Chicago | 01:37:25 | |
| Sears Steve | 2022 Dallas | 01:37:38 | |
| Dunn Michael | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:37:30 | |
| Martis Jeremy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:26 | |
| Foo Tung Sheng | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:37:45 | |
| Pilkington Andrew | 2024 Glasgow | 01:37:11 | |
| Leonard Ben | 2024 Brisbane | 01:37:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
