Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sharp David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sharp David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sharp David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sharp David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:19 | 07:46 to 06:27 | 51.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:07 | 08:52 to 07:45 | 43.5% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:11 to 05:05 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:42 to 04:40 | 1.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:08 to 03:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:43 to 05:43 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:32 to 46:32 | 0.0% |
| Sharp David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 05:03 +00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 05:06 | 04:39 +00:03 | 05:03 +00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 09:48 | 05:35 -00:45 | 09:42 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 14:38 | 03:26 -00:18 | 15:17 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 17:46 | 06:07 -00:17 | 18:43 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:38 | 23:36 | 05:50 -01:12 | 24:50 -01:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:56 | 28:14 | 06:05 -00:09 | 30:40 -02:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:46 | 34:10 | 06:36 +01:10 | 36:45 -02:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 41:56 | 06:21 -00:46 | 43:21 -01:25 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 47:31 | 05:07 +00:04 | 49:42 -02:11 |
| Running 6 | 06:34 | 52:42 | 06:09 +00:25 | 54:49 -02:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 59:16 | 02:31 -00:39 | 01:00:58 -01:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 01:01:08 | 06:08 -00:44 | 01:03:29 -02:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:43 | 01:06:32 | 06:12 -00:29 | 01:09:37 -03:05 |
| Running 8 | 07:21 | 01:12:15 | 07:09 +00:12 | 01:15:49 -03:34 |
| Wall Balls | 08:52 | 01:19:36 | 07:58 +00:54 | 01:22:58 -03:22 |
| Roxzone | 11:11 | 01:39:31 | 08:35 +02:36 | 01:39:31 |
One notable area of improvement is his roxzone time, which was 02:21 slower than the average. This indicates that he may have taken more time to transition between exercise zones or rested more than necessary. Improving overall fitness and focusing on reducing transition time can help him improve in this segment.
Additionally, his total running time of 00:46:32 was 00:27 slower than the average. This suggests that he may benefit from training more on strength exercises to improve his running performance.
Overall, by improving his overall fitness, reducing transition time, and focusing on specific areas of improvement, David can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. It is important for him to tailor his training routine to address the specific areas identified and to consistently work on developing both his strength and running abilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bernstein Jonas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:39:35 | |
| Bassan Fabio | 2024 Turin | 01:39:10 | |
| Braconi Gabriele | 2023 Milan | 01:39:01 | |
| PurbaBarnard Samuel | 2024 Perth | 01:39:10 | |
| Poulton Mark | 2023 London | 01:39:03 | |
| Magalhaes Luiz | 2023 New York | 01:39:59 | |
| 齐 子轩 | 2024 Beijing | 01:39:52 | |
| Pisano Justin | 2020 Chicago | 01:39:53 | |
| Farthofer Thomas | 2023 München | 01:39:22 | |
| Niemann Marc | 2019 Hamburg | 01:40:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
