Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 150 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcswegan Anthony's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcswegan Anthony's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcswegan Anthony's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcswegan Anthony's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:47 | 01:03:08 to 57:21 | 50.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:55 | 12:30 to 10:35 | 16.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:24 | 08:52 to 07:28 | 12.2% |
| Sled Push | 01:08 | 05:33 to 04:25 | 9.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:39 | 08:36 to 07:57 | 5.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:25 | 09:03 to 08:38 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 05:16 to 05:03 | 1.9% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Mcswegan Anthony | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:48 | 00:00 | 06:03 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:16 | 05:48 | 04:58 +00:18 | 06:03 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:45 | 11:04 | 06:45 +00:00 | 11:01 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 05:33 | 17:49 | 04:24 +01:09 | 17:46 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 08:08 | 23:22 | 07:38 +00:30 | 22:10 +01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 08:52 | 31:30 | 07:42 +01:10 | 29:48 +01:42 |
| Running 4 | 08:04 | 40:22 | 07:38 +00:26 | 37:30 +02:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:03 | 48:26 | 09:29 -00:26 | 45:08 +03:18 |
| Running 5 | 08:16 | 57:29 | 08:04 +00:12 | 54:37 +02:52 |
| Rowing | 05:31 | 01:05:45 | 05:38 -00:07 | 01:02:41 +03:04 |
| Running 6 | 07:53 | 01:11:16 | 07:49 +00:04 | 01:08:19 +02:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 01:19:09 | 03:03 -00:11 | 01:16:08 +03:01 |
| Running 7 | 07:52 | 01:22:01 | 07:53 -00:01 | 01:19:11 +02:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:36 | 01:29:53 | 09:03 -00:27 | 01:27:04 +02:49 |
| Running 8 | 10:24 | 01:38:29 | 10:58 -00:34 | 01:36:07 +02:22 |
| Wall Balls | 12:30 | 01:48:53 | 11:36 +00:54 | 01:47:05 +01:48 |
| Roxzone | 09:18 | 02:10:35 | 11:54 -02:36 | 02:10:35 |
Anthony Mcswegan performed well in the HYROX race, finishing in the top 67% of all athletes and the top 70% in his age group. His overall time of 02:10:35 is respectable, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance.
Based on the splits analysis, Anthony's total running time of 01:03:08 was 02:32 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:48 suggests that he has the potential to perform better in running segments.
In conclusion, Anthony Mcswegan performed well in the HYROX race but can make improvements in certain areas to enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, he can improve his running speed, endurance, and overall race performance. Implementing effective race strategies, including proper pacing and efficient transitions, will also contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ayers Ben | 2023 Singapore | 02:10:49 | |
| Lazaro Angel | 2022 Los Angeles | 02:10:34 | |
| Staben Brodie | 2024 Brisbane | 02:10:57 | |
| Dennis Callum | 2024 London | 02:10:14 | |
| Walker Peter | 2023 Singapore | 02:10:16 | |
| Foundos Matt | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:10:32 | |
| Affoon Kyle | 2021 Dallas | 02:10:30 | |
| Cajigas Lopez Fernando | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:10:47 | |
| Centanaro Juan | 2024 Anaheim | 02:10:36 | |
| Diedrich Dennis | 2019 Hamburg | 02:10:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 02:14:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
