Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:25 (From 06:35 to 04:10) | 58.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:30 (From 02:49 to 02:19) | 12.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 (From 04:19 to 04:00) | 7.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 (From 02:07 to 01:48) | 7.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 (From 04:28 to 04:12) | 6.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 (From 05:20 to 05:09) | 4.5% |
| Rowing | 00:06 (From 04:37 to 04:31) | 2.4% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:10 to 04:10) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 37:51 to 37:51) | 0.0% |
| Hollmann Mario | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:04 | 04:19 +00:09 | 04:18 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:32 | 08:32 | 04:34 -00:02 | 08:37 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 13:04 | 02:38 +00:11 | 13:11 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 04:51 | 15:53 | 04:57 -00:06 | 15:49 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:19 | 20:44 | 04:23 -00:04 | 20:46 -00:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:40 | 25:03 | 04:56 -00:16 | 25:09 -00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:10 | 29:43 | 04:35 -00:25 | 30:05 -00:22 |
| Running 5 | 04:44 | 33:53 | 05:04 -00:20 | 34:40 -00:47 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 38:37 | 04:38 -00:01 | 39:44 -01:07 |
| Running 6 | 04:46 | 43:14 | 04:57 -00:11 | 44:22 -01:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 48:00 | 01:59 +00:08 | 49:19 -01:19 |
| Running 7 | 04:45 | 50:07 | 04:56 -00:11 | 51:18 -01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:35 | 54:52 | 04:31 +02:04 | 56:14 -01:22 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:01:27 | 05:24 +00:10 | 01:00:45 +00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:07:01 | 05:41 -00:21 | 01:06:09 +00:52 |
| Roxzone | 05:29 | 01:17:40 | 05:50 -00:21 | 01:17:40 |
Mario's best running lap was 00:04:04, which was 5 seconds faster than the average. He showed consistent performance throughout the race, with several splits being faster than the average time. However, there are areas where improvement is needed, particularly in the sandbag lunges and ski erg segments.
- Bulgarian split squats: This exercise targets the quadriceps, hamstrings, and glutes, which are essential for lunging movements.
- Walking lunges with weights: By incorporating weights, Mario can simulate the resistance experienced during sandbag lunges and improve his muscular endurance.
- Step-ups with a sandbag: This exercise mimics the movement pattern of sandbag lunges and helps strengthen the muscles used in this segment.
Additionally, Mario should pay attention to his form during sandbag lunges, ensuring that he maintains proper posture, engages his core, and uses his legs and glutes effectively.
2. Ski Erg: Mario was 13 seconds slower than the average in the ski erg segment. To improve performance in this area, Mario should focus on his cardiovascular endurance and technique. Specific training strategies include:
- Interval training on the ski erg: Incorporating high-intensity intervals, such as 30 seconds of maximum effort followed by 30 seconds of active recovery, can improve Mario's cardiovascular fitness and speed on the ski erg.
- Upper body strength training: Strengthening the muscles used in the ski erg, such as the shoulders, back, and arms, can enhance Mario's power and efficiency in this segment.
- Technique drills: Mario should practice proper technique on the ski erg, focusing on maintaining a smooth and efficient rowing motion while engaging the correct muscle groups.
In conclusion, Mario Hollmann performed well in the Hyrox race in Munich, with a solid overall rank and top placement in his age group. While his running performance was strong, there are areas for improvement in the sandbag lunges and ski erg segments. By focusing on specific training strategies, drills, and techniques, Mario can enhance his performance in these areas and further improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Owen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:32 | |
| Haughton Tim | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:17:48 | |
| Fischer Eric | 2022 Essen | 01:17:37 | |
| Naranjo Moreno Alfonso | 2024 Bilbao | 01:17:15 | |
| Borghi Giorgio | 2024 Rimini | 01:17:31 | |
| Winslade Mark | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:17:23 | |
| Regnell Fredrick | 2023 Stockholm | 01:17:11 | |
| Kapasakis Anthony | 2019 New York | 01:17:13 | |
| Kraciński Adrian | 2024 Katowice | 01:18:09 | |
| Branca Gabriele | 2024 Milan | 01:17:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Frankfurt Hollmann Mario | 01:21:48 | |
| 2022 Frankfurt Hollmann Mario | 01:08:40 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt Hollmann Mario | 01:08:18 | |
| 2024 Stuttgart Hollmann Mario | 01:09:22 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt Hollmann Mario | 01:21:56 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt Hollmann Mario, Ullsperger Andre, Mühle Anna, Mühle Ursula | 01:21:01 | |
| 2024 Berlin Hollmann Mario, Krause Nicole | 01:02:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Hollmann Mario
